Been pondering the politics of so-called "bisexual health", and looking at relevant research (such as it is, which isn't a lot when you come to specifically bi stuff
( Read more... )
The authors (all of the ones I've met are lovely and at least one of them is bisexual) reckon these are minimum figures, not least because these questions get higher non-response rates.
That HEA/Sigma report I should be able to get my hands on on Monday had to stop advertising for BB men because they were swamped.
Comments 4
Reply
http://www.glhv.org.au/?q=taxonomy/term/7&from=30
including:
Bisexuality and Health Psychology - Strange Bedfellows?
(An Australian study)
http://www.glhv.org.au/files/bisexuality_health_psych.pdf
and:
Improving the Access and Quality of Public Health Services for Bisexuals (Canada)
Health Psychology Update, Vol. 14, Issue 2, 2005.
http://www.glhv.org.au/files/bisexual_health_canada.pdf
Reply
2. NATSAL is the nearest to that. You want the second one, because the figures are higher methodology is better.
Summary at http://www.avert.org/hsexu1.htm and most of them will be bi, not lesbian/gay.
The authors (all of the ones I've met are lovely and at least one of them is bisexual) reckon these are minimum figures, not least because these questions get higher non-response rates.
That HEA/Sigma report I should be able to get my hands on on Monday had to stop advertising for BB men because they were swamped.
Reply
. Much respect!
Reply
Leave a comment