This was inspired by
skylanth and commentary by
takhys, so all honor to those worthies.
What makes a problem a 'first world problem'? I submit, as
takhys put it
in Skylanth's repost, that at the core, a problem is a problem, no matter where it happens. Using that term 'first world' just sets up these mental/conceptual barriers between us. My last LJ Idol post -
(
Read more... )
Comments 22
The problem is very different when the issues involve inadequate food supply, for instance. Part of what makes FWP's so frustrating is that people think there's these simple, neat, and wrong ways of correcting them that involve no nuances or accommodations for specific circumstances. Hence why I think the distinction is important.
Reply
Reply
For example: In the first world, I complain about my DVR not recording something.
In the third world, they do not even know what a DVR is, and probably don't even have a TV.
And I should remember that before kvetching about something so trivial. (I do, sometimes, but not always)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Just because somebody has it worse than I do doesn't automatically mean my problem isn't real. It just means that I should conserve my distress for the more severe ones. My DVR didn't record, ok, it's a minor thing. But having an asthma attack because I don't have a car and the mile walk to the bus stop nailed me? Not so minor, and I called a friend to take me to the hospital.
(Then again, I also suffer from clinical depression and am used to people treating it as not real, so my cope methods are in place for that if the internet buttheads decide to try it).
Reply
Problems are problems and when you come right down to it, we all have the same ones: putting food on the table, taking care of family, and putting a roof over our heads. Anything else is secondary.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment