It's useful that LJ will let you use blobbyblobby whether "blobbyblobby" is a user, a community or a feed, and it will put the correct little icon in for you. So I just use "lj user=" for everything.
Of course when I want to link to a post I don't use the special lj tag, I just take the HTTP URL and use that, so I'm just like you!
Hi there - I found your journal through jackiesjottings - hope you don't mind me adding you? Feel free to check out my journal and add back if you wish, also my website is www.esmereldalittleflame.com to show you more of who I am :-) :-) Blessings, Gemma "ELF"
Respnse to Guardian article on science in the days of Newton. . .
This is because, "back in the day", scientists actually went by evidence as best as the had, rather than today, when we have obvious liars pretending the universe magically appeared all by itself. is really the Richard Dawkins' of this world who believe in the very worst kind of achemy, black magic and most baseless of all superstitions. It is as if since the time of Newton, scientists in general have became far more, rather than less superstitious.
Comments 14
Reply
Reply
It's useful that LJ will let you use blobbyblobby whether "blobbyblobby" is a user, a community or a feed, and it will put the correct little icon in for you. So I just use "lj user=" for everything.
Of course when I want to link to a post I don't use the special lj tag, I just take the HTTP URL and use that, so I'm just like you!
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
This is because, "back in the day", scientists actually went by evidence as best as the had, rather than today, when we have obvious liars pretending the universe magically appeared all by itself. is really the Richard Dawkins' of this world who believe in the very worst kind of achemy, black magic and most baseless of all superstitions. It is as if since the time of Newton, scientists in general have became far more, rather than less superstitious.
Reply
Leave a comment