nooooooo!rachaelireneDecember 23 2003, 09:25:34 UTC
no nicole!!! now that "person" who made me look stupid w/ the audrey hepburn comment cant respnd!!!!! bring it back!!! i worked so hard on that comeback too :(
you have made three comments trying to justify your first one. this is my second, and i reinterate, you're an idiot. If you need someone to highlight the invisible text for you, tact is being able to shut up when the situation calls for it.
my oh my, look how we fightrachaelireneDecember 23 2003, 21:15:25 UTC
i reiterate, you're not making sense. if you truly exercised tact, you wouldn't have started the argument in the first place, or even responded when i tried to defend myself. just so you know: tact is a sense of knowing what to say (or in your case, type) or how to act to maintain good relations. and as of now, i would describe our relationship far from amicable. since you don't know what tact is, you can't claim that you've used it against me. (remember "it's called tact rachael'?) and you call me the idiot? one thing i would like to get out of all this immature on-line fighting is knowing exactly what made you make the "audrey hepburn" comment in the first place. what have i done to you? it must have been pretty bad for this to go on as long as it is, and i apologize in advance, although i doubt i ever insulted you beforehand.
A) I have exercised tact by first suggesting it to you in my original post.
B) This is within the boundaries of tact, because i was choosing to say what was correct in the situation. The reason you think that i have not bothered to make the relationship of you and i more stable, is probably because i haven't.
C) You have quite an identity crisis on your hands if you believe i commented on your icon. Your accusation would be referred to as a witch hunt, and in turn steepens the slope of your ignorance.
This is my last remark on this conversation, and i do hope that you are capable of realizing that you've made an utter fool of yourself by deciding to chase after a comment that was anonymous, as well as by trying to defend yourself from what should have been acknowledged as advice.
this will be my last as wellrachaelireneDecember 23 2003, 23:08:54 UTC
A) suggesting tact is in no way the same as exercising it. an example of exercising tact would be not even mentioning it in what you say was your "original post" because tact is basically trying to maintain 'good relations'. you didn't even pay attention to the simple definition of tact that i provided for your convenience in my last post. so, technically, your actions have actually showed your lack of tact since 'good relations' have not been achieved, obviously
( ... )
i shouldn't have been so cruel to you the other night. it was unfair for me to post our argument on your journal. i haven't been a good friend to you at all lately, and i will try my hardest to set all this right.
32 hours in a car can knock alot of sense into you.
Comments 16
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
it's not tact if you responded.
Reply
Reply
Reply
since you don't know what tact is, you can't claim that you've used it against me. (remember "it's called tact rachael'?) and you call me the idiot?
one thing i would like to get out of all this immature on-line fighting is knowing exactly what made you make the "audrey hepburn" comment in the first place. what have i done to you? it must have been pretty bad for this to go on as long as it is, and i apologize in advance, although i doubt i ever insulted you beforehand.
Reply
B) This is within the boundaries of tact, because i was choosing to say what was correct in the situation. The reason you think that i have not bothered to make the relationship of you and i more stable, is probably because i haven't.
C) You have quite an identity crisis on your hands if you believe i commented on your icon. Your accusation would be referred to as a witch hunt, and in turn steepens the slope of your ignorance.
This is my last remark on this conversation, and i do hope that you are capable of realizing that you've made an utter fool of yourself by deciding to chase after a comment that was anonymous, as well as by trying to defend yourself from what should have been acknowledged as advice.
Reply
"This is my last remark on this conversation,"
thank you. very. much.
rachael you're digging yourself further, just ignore him. really, he doesn't know you so don't take it all personally.
Reply
Reply
nicole i'm sorry:(
i shouldn't have been so cruel to you the other night. it was unfair for me to post our argument on your journal. i haven't been a good friend to you at all lately, and i will try my hardest to set all this right.
32 hours in a car can knock alot of sense into you.
-serena
Reply
=)
Reply
Leave a comment