Leave a comment

Comments 5

kimmira August 16 2006, 17:41:47 UTC
Whoosh, yeah.. I don't think anyone would be keen to learn 53 planets. I would think they'd look ahead and see that if there would be that many under the new definition they'd better have a slightly altered system..

Reply


butterkitty August 16 2006, 20:52:59 UTC
If it ain't broke, don't fix it. I like 9 planets. Not 12! Not 53!

"My car gets forty rods to the hogshead, and that's the way I likes it!"

Reply


ladyamedeus August 17 2006, 05:17:52 UTC
Pfft. I knew that like ten years ago.

Reply


xreddestinyx August 17 2006, 05:27:57 UTC
I'd love to see the crazy mnemonics you'd have to use for 53 planets. Yeesh!

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

mib24601 August 17 2006, 23:58:43 UTC
2003 UB 313 is actually larger than Pluto, which is what led to this who debacle in the first place. If you're going to have Pluto, you're going to have 2003 UB 313 and that's just the way it is.

Of course, if 2003 UB 313 is classified as a planet, it will get a name immediately aferwards. The delay is from deciding if it should recieve a planet name or a name from a different system (different types of objects get named from different lists).

Reply


Leave a comment

Up