Woman who was beaten says DA's office mishandled her case

Oct 20, 2008 21:17

Not a strong enough headline, in my opinion ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 20

flewellyn October 21 2008, 11:43:16 UTC
Couldn't prove that he entered with intent to commit another felony?

Like hell.

This is tantamount to a declaration that assaulting women is legal.

Reply

doitalone October 21 2008, 19:11:44 UTC
This happens so often. Basically what it boils down to is you can't use circular logic to prove your case.

I *really* don't understand why it's not a class E felony though.

Reply

flewellyn October 21 2008, 19:46:53 UTC
Well, when he shouted through the door that he was going to kill her, broke down her door, and then proceeded to beat her until he thought she was dead...I think the intent is pretty damn clear.

Reply

doitalone October 21 2008, 19:49:31 UTC
Well right, which is why I don't understand why it's not a class E felony. :(

Is this his first offense?

Reply


fiduch November 3 2008, 06:00:06 UTC
i know i'm way fucking late on this, but i have to agree that intent would be very difficult to prove on the burglarly charge. however, i am also puzzled that the battery charge was so mild. it seems to me that was the DA's biggest mistake, and from the sound of things, that was the decision of the original DA, not the replacement. that was definitely enough to be considered "substantial bodily harm" if not "great bodily harm".

Reply


Leave a comment

Up