024

May 06, 2009 00:20

The toilet won't flush!

And who invented these repulsive clogs? I thought Brian Smith was the worst of them all but now I might be wrong. At least those UGGs were-- well-- Never mind, I'm not going to mistake lesser sins for virtues. But you're not winning, City, because Blair Waldorf would rather go barefoot than wear your fashion item of choice ( Read more... )

cinderella, calories pwn me, cursed, fashion faux pas deserves capital punish, arthur pendragon

Leave a comment

Comments 313

[Private] thefutureking May 5 2009, 14:39:52 UTC
Of course, I'll be right over.

Is everything alright?

Reply

[Private] miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 14:40:56 UTC
Junior misses you.

Reply

Re: [Private] thefutureking May 5 2009, 14:42:07 UTC
Poor Junior.

Reply

[Private] miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 14:43:59 UTC
I still think you were great out there.

Reply


elevatorwarrior May 5 2009, 14:54:11 UTC
Sounds like you're having a real rough time of it, Blair. Be careful someone doesn't step on your toes.

(ooc: incidentally, nice juicy gossip on his last post with necrophilia, but wouldn't do it IC.)

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 14:59:42 UTC
Don't worry about me, I know how to take care of my toes.

Reply

elevatorwarrior May 5 2009, 15:03:02 UTC
I bet you know how to take care of a lot of things.

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 15:03:42 UTC
Indeed I do. But why would you be interested?

Reply


tothelibrary May 5 2009, 15:25:12 UTC
Uggs pretty much need to disappear forever. Snow boots are not needed in places where it never snows.

...Especially if you wear them with miniskirts. I mean, beyond the 'but don't your feet get hot, and also if it's warm enough for a miniskirt it is not cold enough for fuzzy leg covering boots' thing, they're just ugly.

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 15:27:02 UTC
Arguing about comfort versus style is always old and irrelevant, but in the case of Uggs? It qualified for neither.

Did you get the Miu Mius?

Reply

tothelibrary May 5 2009, 15:32:28 UTC
Shoes can be both very very awesome and not foot murder-y. Comfortable doesn't have to equal not fun to look at.

...And sometimes, a little bit of uncomfortable is worth it. For really cute shoes.

No, I-- with the hectic flavored way things all kind of happened one after another, any shopping for gorgeous shoes was unfortunately not my top priority. Which is pretty much crime level sad.

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 15:34:10 UTC
Oh, do say it again.

Well, I have some shopping to do for someone so I might as well do it for myself too.

Reply


adamantined May 5 2009, 15:51:14 UTC
You're seriously counting calories?

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 16:17:57 UTC
You're seriously not counting calories?

Reply

adamantined May 5 2009, 16:20:04 UTC
No? I just eat whenever I'm hungry, try to eat right, and don't worry about stuff like that. You shouldn't either.

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 16:21:23 UTC
Ew, you're barbaric. The only time I don't count calories is--

Reply


voice; screwitin May 5 2009, 16:18:21 UTC
I don't think the shoes are that bad~. They could be far worse.

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 16:20:22 UTC
They go clunk clunk clunk and nothing goes with them. I feel like-- timber ready to fall.

Reply

screwitin May 5 2009, 16:22:24 UTC
Now that is something I can agree with. My heels would match with my clothes so much more.

Reply

miss_waldorf May 5 2009, 16:23:48 UTC
I just got myself these Stella McCartney Mesh Sandals and now they've turned to clogs too. They better turn back once this is over.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up