This might make me a six-year old, but...

Mar 29, 2007 14:51

...I couldn't stop rofling when I read this Curling definition from the Urban Dictionary:

A true embarrassment to human existence. A non-sport which involves some loser thrown a flat, cylindrical stone yelling non-sensical things at two even bigger losers, using their "specialized" brooms to... SWEEP THE FUCKING ICE ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 16

nyn17 March 29 2007, 12:58:46 UTC
Ahahahah *rofls along with you*;))

Reply

missapocalyptic March 29 2007, 13:04:19 UTC
Yay, I'm not the only one! *happily endulges in childish giggling with you*

Reply


ultra_chrome March 29 2007, 13:44:22 UTC
*wipes tea from monitor*

Nah, a 6 year old wouldn't understand homoerotic....I'd say at least 7 1/2, maybe 8.

*starts chuckling again*

Reply

missapocalyptic March 29 2007, 13:57:11 UTC
Nah, a 6 year old wouldn't understand homoerotic....I'd say at least 7 1/2, maybe 8.

Yes, thank you. I'm glad you could clarify that.

Reply

ultra_chrome March 30 2007, 16:52:50 UTC
I can only do that because I turned 7 3/4 yesterday. LOL

Reply


bjohan57 March 29 2007, 21:24:47 UTC
I just came off watching Men With Brooms coincidentally. I've now decided that the first half is crap, and the second half is great...not coincidentally when the Curling starts. I am a big fat loser (I love watching Curling!) but when Paul Gross is playing it, then surely it immediately becomes more socially acceptable to fantasise about his broom?

Reply

missapocalyptic March 29 2007, 21:43:14 UTC
...it immediately becomes more socially acceptable to fantasise about his broom?

*groans* Okay, you're even younger than I am! ;)

Why do you think the first part is crap? I enjoyed it...

Reply

bjohan57 March 30 2007, 04:54:15 UTC
*sniggers*

First Part: Too much forced physical comedy which isn't very well done, stupid slap-sticky situations, 400lb defecating man!, awkward character introductions, badly done computerised beavers, ASA!, and Donald Foley is a really bad actor.

Reply

missapocalyptic March 30 2007, 09:15:10 UTC
...but...but...the first part got Paul saying "vibrators"! *whines*

And, yeah, those things you mentioned are... not so terribly good. Gotta admit that. But what about the second part, in which Chris Cutter engages in some clichéd and not very well done screen-kissing, while Paul Gross sings "kiss you till you weep"? I tend to stop watching before that. Or rather, skip to the bloopers right away.

Reply


bjohan57 April 1 2007, 17:30:34 UTC
Also: "You're a rough-neck on an Oil patch, Chris." Wow. I had never realized he was supposed to be a rough-neck either.

I put that down simply to Paul's rather prominent Alpha-Male tendencies. He needed a job which would have kept Chris away and moving around for 10 years. He could have picked anything...so he went for one of the most masculine-oriented, physically-demanding, testosterony industries out there. He didn't make him a manager as I think that Paul has an inbred distrust of anyone who wears a tie for a living. I also thought the oil thing was a slight nod to Alberta, but that could just be me. But no, had Chris Cutter been a rough-neck, then he should have had at least a ...well, rough neck. Unless Chris worked as the oil industry's official GQ model.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up