I know, the jurrers said that the looked at the evidence and it was obvious he was innocent. but on the news this morning a jurrer said he felt he was guilty but his guilt was irrelevant... how is it irrelevant!?!?!?!
lol
its written plainly.. as simply as it can come..
micheal jackson mollested children.. do you think he payed them off or they actually felt he was innocent?
i dont know, some of them probably actually thought the man was innocent, which is PATHETIC. they probably labor under the impression that "hey, he's famous! he couldn't possibly do anything wrong!" thats probably the reason the juror declared his guilt irrelevant.
if this was ANYONE else pretty much, they'd be going straight to jail. america makes me sick sometimes.
Comments 11
Reply
Reply
lol
its written plainly.. as simply as it can come..
micheal jackson mollested children.. do you think he payed them off or they actually felt he was innocent?
Reply
if this was ANYONE else pretty much, they'd be going straight to jail. america makes me sick sometimes.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
*racks brain*
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment