Ayn Rand books are preachy wastes of paper that would better be put to use wiping my butthole. This is one of those few points in which I am absolutely right and all those who disagree with me are completely wrong, end of story. Anyone who buys into her "philosophy" (a term used loosely in this case) is intellectually masturbating because they are
(
Read more... )
Comments 6
Reply
I meant that you can control what you do in your life, but you can't always control the outcome. Being in SUPREME control would mean that you control both your actions and their results. I can punch someone in the face, but I can't control if they're going to hit back, run away, pull out a knife and stab me through the eye, etc, etc So in some respect, what happens to me relies upon what others do; so the idea that I can completely control what happens to me is silly.
Reply
you can be in control of your life to a certain extent, but because the actions of others overlap so much and are intertwined, there is a lot that is out of your hands. the actions that are your call though, you should take responsibility for.
Reply
And yeah, what you say is true about taking responsibility for your actions. That's why I don't like Rand "novels" because they seem to promote the idea of selfish objectivism that is not taking into account possible negative consequences; not just to the self, but to others. Unaccountability is my largest qualm with Objectivism. It seems to be a largely (if not completely) unsympathetic philosophy.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment