A Very Glee Post
Some very interesting things have led me to make some observations on some non-hetero relationships within the Gleeverse.
Am I the only person who thinks Bartie was cute and that there is always room for Santittany regardless? Like, I'm not talking a threeway but a pretty good bisexuality plot to be explored.
To me it was always obvious that Brit *loved* Santana but Santana has to come to terms with her own sexuality; and whats wrong with Brit having some nice, safe feelings for Artie whilst enjoying a comfortable relationship... at the end of the day she may love him but she doesnt *love* him like she loves Santana so it will always work out..? Artie isn't being truthful with his emotions either.
I like their cute, make-each-other-feel-good relationship, because with the way Santana is now, Brittany is never going to get what she wants from her, if she even knows what she wants.
I am also hoping Kevin meant a love triangle and not a 3way in his tweet.
IDK, I'd like to think that a sexuality plotline other than HOMO-sexuality could be explored, that its not a bad thing, but why does everyone have to define themselves in such black and white terms? You don't have to stick to boys OR girls, there is so much more than that!I think Brittany is one of the free-est, most open minded characters on the show, she doesn't really see any boundaries to what she is doing, and respected Kurt being gay (by that I mean when she wanted to make out with him because she though he wasn't gay like she had first thought, and not before) and doesnt understand why she can't sing a freaking Melissa Etheridge song with the girl who gives her lady kisses and sweet scissoring. it would be hot and it would be fun and then there would be a dinner for two with some more scissoring and lady kisses afterwards.
and what is so wrong with that?
I've never thought they were girls kissing each other because they're girls, but Diana Agron's comment of 'they're just girls being girls' i took to mean, it doesnt have to be 'we're in love' they can like lady bits and just want to fuck. Puck screwing around is just a boy being a boy, right? (okay maybe that is beign a bit free with a comment but whatever)
At the end of the day, I don't see not having Santana and Brittany in a relationship as being a slap in the face or a TV-hiroshima of epic proportions, I see it as two sexually free girls figuiring out the difference between sex and dating and the difference between friendship and love. As a person who had a relationship which blurred the boundaries between friendship and love with another girl, just because you're always all over each other doesn't mean you have to want to be together, and just because you're seeing other people doesnt mean you dont want to be together.
I have faith in this pairing, it is a match made in heaven. I love those girls..
did that make sense? Did I lose my way? I'm prone to doing that.
Am I the only person who thinks Bartie was cute and that there is always room for Santittany regardless? Like, I'm not talking a threeway but a pretty good bisexuality plot to be explored.
To me it was always obvious that Brit *loved* Santana but Santana has to come to terms with her own sexuality; and whats wrong with Brit having some nice, safe feelings for Artie whilst enjoying a comfortable relationship... at the end of the day she may love him but she doesnt *love* him like she loves Santana so it will always work out..? Artie isn't being truthful with his emotions either.
I like their cute, make-each-other-feel-good relationship, because with the way Santana is now, Brittany is never going to get what she wants from her, if she even knows what she wants.
I am also hoping Kevin meant a love triangle and not a 3way in his tweet.
IDK, I'd like to think that a sexuality plotline other than HOMO-sexuality could be explored, that its not a bad thing, but why does everyone have to define themselves in such black and white terms? You don't have to stick to boys OR girls, there is so much more than that!I think Brittany is one of the free-est, most open minded characters on the show, she doesn't really see any boundaries to what she is doing, and respected Kurt being gay (by that I mean when she wanted to make out with him because she though he wasn't gay like she had first thought, and not before) and doesnt understand why she can't sing a freaking Melissa Etheridge song with the girl who gives her lady kisses and sweet scissoring. it would be hot and it would be fun and then there would be a dinner for two with some more scissoring and lady kisses afterwards.
and what is so wrong with that?
I've never thought they were girls kissing each other because they're girls, but Diana Agron's comment of 'they're just girls being girls' i took to mean, it doesnt have to be 'we're in love' they can like lady bits and just want to fuck. Puck screwing around is just a boy being a boy, right? (okay maybe that is beign a bit free with a comment but whatever)
At the end of the day, I don't see not having Santana and Brittany in a relationship as being a slap in the face or a TV-hiroshima of epic proportions, I see it as two sexually free girls figuiring out the difference between sex and dating and the difference between friendship and love. As a person who had a relationship which blurred the boundaries between friendship and love with another girl, just because you're always all over each other doesn't mean you have to want to be together, and just because you're seeing other people doesnt mean you dont want to be together.
I have faith in this pairing, it is a match made in heaven. I love those girls..
did that make sense? Did I lose my way? I'm prone to doing that.