Comments | mizugameza: Woe is me, woe is you, woe is the devil that stole my shoe.

mizugameza

Woe is me, woe is you, woe is the devil that stole my shoe.

Jun 22, 2005 01:24

Because I really should write in this more.

I Claim To Be Tagged by yakk! But no, he didn't really tag me.

Make a list of your pet peeves - no size limit, but at least 5.

1. Being poked. Maybe that's silly, but I've had to spend hours or more just sitting there unable to properly retaliate in any satisfying way as siblings of mine poked me. I do ( Read more... )

Comments 4

yakk June 22 2005, 18:55:35 UTC

"5. People thinking being bisexual is some sort of selfish thing, or that you have to be gay or straight, not like both genders."

I've heard this one before, and I've never understood it. It's not like the world has a shortage on either of the genders, and you aren't dating two people at once anyway. How does this make sense?

mizugameza June 22 2005, 19:13:59 UTC

*sighs* I just don't know how it makes sense in the eyes of the people who call it selfish. But I am tired of trying to talk patiently with them about it in hopes they'll understand that it's not. I guess, to some people, maybe THEY have said to be straight/gay and have found the same/opposite gender attractive, and feel that it's not right for some reason. So they say the people who admit they're bisexual are selfish, because they can't "choose a gender" to like?

...I don't know. Maybe they think it's something like being indecisive...? I just don't know...

But I really get tired of hearing this from guys talking to me and half the people around us knowing i'm bisexual.

yakk June 23 2005, 00:21:19 UTC

Some guys can be strange about that sort of thing. I've never heard any male complain about a female being bisexual or gay. In fact, the majority of them seem to like it. Why, I have yet to fathom. It makes no difference to me; a person is a person, regardless of sexual preference.

The whole "girl-on-girl" thing completely eludes me. If I'm going to watch pornography, I'd rather see a man and a woman, not two women (or two men). Not that I mind it, like I said, but a woman interested in only women would not be interested in me. Isn't that part of watching pornography to begin with?

mizugameza June 23 2005, 00:28:05 UTC

Get online, damn you, and we can discuss this better.

On a serious note...I can understand the "girl-on-girl" thing, eactually...at least, i'm guessing this is how it is. It's two people, or at least, two members of a gender that you're attracted to having sex. Some people find this interesting without thinking on how it means they wouldn't touch a male. In another view, they could be thinking the girls would touch them as well, and find it interesting because of that with the scene of the two girls. ...Does that make sense?

I hear guys complain about bisexuality and lesbianism with females aaaaaall the time...*sighs* Hats off to you, though, yakk, I like your views on things. Even if i'm certain that I don't think the same way you do on everything. :D

But, yeah, I think that's the point of pornography...though, yet again, to the first paragraph...I can also see why people like men with men (I know a lot of women who love this, but would NEVER say it to many males, if any...), and women with women in pornography.