Oct 05, 2012 16:23
Person on Google+, bemoaning the increase in gay/lesbian characters in the media: Don't you see it? They are broadcasting it because of ratings and money, they don't care about their audience.
Um... wouldn't not caring about their audience be rather counterproductive to getting ratings and money?
Leave a comment
Comments 19
Reply
Reply
Either that, or the OP thinks "audience" means "me".
Reply
Which is undoubtedly true.
Reply
Reply
Leaving aside the "souls" thing:
1. On what planet is TV supposed to be "morally uplifting"? I thought it was supposed to be entertaining and maybe informative, in theory, anyway. And, from the creators' POV (and I don't mean "God"), lucrative.
2. Do tell, how is making shows featuring *all* kinds of people in a variety of roles not "morally uplifting"?
3. If TV was made for me, trust me, there would be no "reality" shows, and David Tennant would be in *everything*. :-)
Reply
Reply
I'll also talk about shows like Two and a Half Men and Glee although I stopped watching them.
You should be allowed to criticise what's on TV and how it influences the overall media without being told "lol well just don't watch it then?"
BUT the Google+ user didn't seem to be properly criticising rather than whining about how underrepresented characters become more and more represented, so my point isn't exactly valid for their case. ;)
Reply
The only reason I know that something called "honey boo boo" exists is because of people bitching about it.
Yes, people are allowed to criticise it, but every time they do, they give it free publicity.
Reply
Leave a comment