Peepholes in men's toilets too (
Razor TV)
"Peepholes in men's toilets" would be a reasonable headline. But "Peepholes in men's toilets too"? Do I sense the somewhat (or perhaps more than somewhat) sexist assumption that women attract sexual attention (objectification through a gaze) whereas there is nothing about men that attracts scopophilic
(
Read more... )
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
Being stared at is what female bodies are for - but women are damaged in some way if they are not stared at by the right men. (Consent is only relevant in so far as they are using it to reserve themselves for the right man, i.e. husband.)
Being stared at is not what male bodies are for - it will not happen to them, so the idea of whether it is consensual or not is irrelevant.
Under this system, everybody loses: sexual assault of women is only taken seriously if they can fit into the template of 'good girl', and sexual assault of men is rendered invisible altogether.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment