"This account has been either temporarily or permanently suspended. If you are livejournal user puckish please refer to the livejournal faq
( Read more... )
I've already added you back.morality_playDecember 5 2006, 20:21:49 UTC
I hadn't noticed you had done me the courtesy of your introduction until now. I don't make the most consistent use of this journal. I'm here mostly when I'm avoiding doing actual work. I left a message in your journal recently though. I still wouldn't mind knowing what your interest in my journal is, since I barely post to it anymore.
Acorn! You're here!morality_playDecember 5 2006, 20:29:30 UTC
Every time some gibbering livejournal fuckwit runs afoul of me exposing their errors, I start fielding comments about my "formalism." I have never seen such drama inspired by anyone else's use of the word 'conciliatory.' You'd think I had called the accused a fucking infidel
( ... )
But what's one more distraction? Sure! I'll read Hoppe! And since I have you to be my guide on that journey, maybe you can help me absorb his thesis more effectively. Tell me acorn, if Hoppe embraces the sort of cognitive pessimism that Hayek does, how does his model of argumentation ethics get around the false consciousness dilemma?
Around the end of August taudiophile made some comments I took issue with in this thread. This inspired me to share with him, some critical reviews I've made of libertarianism. Here for instance. And here.
This frustrated him. And he balled up his little fists and became quite red. Shortly afterwards, to save face, he started a new thread... here. Unfortunately I brought along the same criticism he had evaded responding to in the first thread! So he got to thinking that he didn't really want to have this argument _that he demanded to have_ anymore. Hence, in an episode of _spectacular_ libertarian dumbfaggotry, he went here, where he implored the lj libertarian community to save him from me...
The only real contender was hhallahh. He's not completely illiterate, but the quality of his thinking has been greatly abused by libertarianism. He was never enthusiastic about participating though, so I relented after a couple
( ... )
Well as near as I can tell, you know what you're talking about. What I said stands. You can usually distinguish the alphas from the betas (to borrow Hoppe's charming nomenclature) by the content. If it's posting nothing but easily verifiable data and scholarly sources, it's usually a scientist. If it's posting nothing but vague aphorisms and appeals to privelaged knowledge, chances are good it's a libertarian.
Comments 10
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
Reply
Also, I'm fucking your wife.
Reply
How did you happen upon that lolbertarian circle-jerk?
Reply
This frustrated him. And he balled up his little fists and became quite red. Shortly afterwards, to save face, he started a new thread... here. Unfortunately I brought along the same criticism he had evaded responding to in the first thread! So he got to thinking that he didn't really want to have this argument _that he demanded to have_ anymore. Hence, in an episode of _spectacular_ libertarian dumbfaggotry, he went here, where he implored the lj libertarian community to save him from me...
leading to hhallahh, eeidswci and ikilled007 rushing to the GOPvsDEM thread to "rough me up."
The battle, I think you'll agree, did not go well for them...
The only real contender was hhallahh. He's not completely illiterate, but the quality of his thinking has been greatly abused by libertarianism. He was never enthusiastic about participating though, so I relented after a couple ( ... )
Reply
Reply
The latest chapter:
http://community.livejournal.com/libertarianism/1885267.html#comments
I'm already bored. They won't do anything interesting.
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment