Comments | mrbloober: A simple Yes or No will suffice

mrbloober

Feb 26, 2006 23:07

When you hear the term "nega-darkness", do you think of light?

Comments 28

thewackypants February 27 2006, 07:26:09 UTC

no. light is anti-darkness

mrbloober February 27 2006, 07:27:12 UTC

But certainly, nega implies negative, and negative darkness can only be light, right? Hight! Might and sight.

thewackypants February 27 2006, 07:30:12 UTC

nega-darkness is really dark darkness...or possibly purple, i haven't decided

snickony February 27 2006, 07:29:56 UTC

Nope... I think of superdarkness

thewackypants February 27 2006, 07:34:02 UTC

( ... )

andrhea February 28 2006, 00:39:54 UTC

I THOUGHT THEY WERE HIGH-FIVING TONGUES.

mrbloober February 27 2006, 07:35:35 UTC

*throws arms up in the air* Since when does nega mean super?!? *storms away*

Thread 15

the_kool_kev February 27 2006, 07:52:22 UTC

I thinks it would be like whats on the other side of the univers, could be white, could be black, or maybe our brains cant even begin to picture it!

_fignuts_ February 27 2006, 08:53:40 UTC

lightness should be referred to as 'double-plus un-darkness'

mrbloober February 27 2006, 09:20:48 UTC

Man I agree

andrhea February 27 2006, 16:58:06 UTC

You're arguing over a "term" that doesn't even exist. That is nega-smart. And yes, I think of light.

mrbloober February 28 2006, 00:20:02 UTC

Haha, nega-smart...Leave it to Andrhea to put a spin on the whole thing.