(Untitled)

Sep 12, 2005 17:37

Car. Fucking. Up.

For whatever reason I like looking out of the library windows of the community college where I usually go to update this horrid thing.

Everything looks grey.

Yes, I always use the "e." I know it's not correct. Fuck off.

Anyway, so here's something from a long time ago to ... well, you'll see.

10 October, 2003. soma_satori"...anyway, I ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 41

ravieslave September 13 2005, 00:21:03 UTC
Soul == quantum properties.
Humanity == borne from chaos.
The beginning of the world was chaos, the influx of the quantum fluctuations, the momentary cooling (borderline entropy?), the scientific creation of life, the proliferation of mammal kingdoms, the consistency of slaves to biology.
Fate relinquishes this while simultaneously nurturing it, but it's not so much a predetermination as it is the widening of the (hallowed) narrowed pathway. Simple laws of thermodynamics: the perpetuation of energy. The profound thing about it is that it simply is (much like the characters of Napoleon Dynamite, heh). Fate facilitates the movement of aforementioned energy (dependent on beliefs?), at which point I descend into my Taoist/duality rant, sans contemplating blades of grass.

Order-defied chaos. You would not know one without knowing the other. Poetic movements in modernism: Is Eliot correct? The chaos of creation ends at languid universal vocals (whisper, not a bang)? Chaos > Structure > Form > Manner > Exordium, all watched over by (machines ( ... )

Reply

ravieslave October 31 2005, 23:09:51 UTC
Those are interesting points, Michelle, but you fail to mention the inherent chaos of Christ-bound religion and the innate fragility of man's not-even-remotely subdued chaos, pushed from the loins of antediluvian egotism.

Reply

ravieslave October 31 2005, 23:10:53 UTC
Egotism is just another form of escapism, ordered or chaotic notwithstanding, self. You failed to mention that.

Reply

ravieslave October 31 2005, 23:12:21 UTC
Is that to also imply religion > chaos > escapism?

Reply


wow neptunegurl September 13 2005, 04:58:03 UTC
can't argue with that all so very true .. (MANY I SHOULD HAVE TALKED IN CAPS ;)...)

Reply

sniff ravieslave September 13 2005, 08:10:50 UTC
Dear Neptune Girl,
You have challenged the entirety of the English language and coerced it into your own vernacular. For this, I salute you.

Love,
Ravie Slave.

PS: Neptune is an interesting planet. Phantom rings? Photon silliness.
*ninja vanish*

Reply

Re: sniff jaddziadax September 14 2005, 22:57:23 UTC
Are you trying to instigate something? lol cause seriously I dont think she will rise to the challenge... it would be a waste of time.

Reply

Re: sniff ravieslave September 14 2005, 23:06:04 UTC
Huh?
No, I'm instigating nothing. She has an unusual manner of typing. I'm not insinuating it's bad; I'm professing it's interesting. : )

I am a defensive person, not an offensive person. I don't start unless provoked. And I like ninja and planets.

Reply


tenebrousvision September 13 2005, 08:57:59 UTC
The 'e' is indeed correct, though moreso in Britain. I use it myself. It looks much better.

But then, I also tend to 'misplace' quotes, because if my character is saying "I want some icecream.", he isn't saying a comma at the end, he's done with his sentence. And he wants some icecream, apparently.

Reply

mrtilley September 14 2005, 23:04:51 UTC
It does look better, I agree.

Why does he want ice cream?

Reply

tenebrousvision September 15 2005, 05:44:38 UTC
Because this is what I command of him! I play with the wants and needs of my characters with every whim, as they are but puppets to me! Bow before my might, puny literary devices, for I am your God!

Or it was a useful example of what I mean.

Reply

mrtilley September 19 2005, 18:57:14 UTC
Either way, I guess. Literary devices are subservient peons anyway, might as well lord it up, like a gangsta felon. Or a lord.

Reply


i have been thinking gorgan8 September 14 2005, 09:51:19 UTC
i have been thinking about fate and the actions of chaos.....and it is in my understanding that man is chaos ... the fact that as humans we try to put a face on nothingness. we do this simply to wash away any anxiety that we has fragile egotistical forms have... so as we look into an abyss consisting of the past, present, future, fate, even gods or the heavens; we see ourselves as better than our fellow twenty-four-chromosomal brethren... but in a farther picture we see our selves as a minuet portion of a grand design ... that fate in any form, good or bad shall see itself through. but what of the mighty oak caught in the hands of a child as but a seed... if it never reaches it's destination... not by choice... is it still fate or was it acted upon by the fate of the child. if so, did said seed have any control over the chaos that was the child??? ... the sad truth is.... no one cares because a million others follow. animals plants all are nothing... science says that animals have no thoughts yet people personify them with human ( ... )

Reply

Re: i have been thinking jaddziadax September 14 2005, 22:56:08 UTC
its an interesting post...
and i understand where it was comming from...

but you never defined once what a "human" or "humanity" is supposed to be...

maybe they are supposed to be the ravenous territorial animals you make them out to be?

Reply

Re: i have been thinking mrtilley September 14 2005, 23:03:57 UTC
I was just over 19 when I wrote it. Like I said, I need to edit it a bit.

Reply

Re: i have been thinking jaddziadax September 14 2005, 23:10:29 UTC
ah no stress.. I remember things like that I wrote like that when I was 19 as well. But things change as you age I suppose.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up