That reminds me of the guy who got exhibitions because he masturbated over paper and called it "art". Ridiculous. Just because something is weird or shocking doesn't make it artistic.
That seems pretty standard fair for that sort of art (the blurb one). It's like the person had my school who just pasted her soiled underwear in a book.
I met a woman at an eco-colony who collects her menstrual fluids and uses it as paint. Her stuff was pretty neat, even if it is kind of gross, because she does it as a feminist expression and it's very meaningful to her. So, in case anyone is wondering if sane people make art out of stuff that comes from their uterus, I guess they do. (She also makes vulva charms out of Sculpey and sells them on necklaces.) But this girl at Yale sounds to me like she just wants the attention. Lame.
Comments 4
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment