Star Wars : Episode I

May 18, 2008 10:30

Except for Darth Maul, this movie is completely without redeeming qualities for me. What was George thinking?

Leave a comment

Comments 20

securebell May 18 2008, 18:37:14 UTC
He was thinking, "The first one won't do well, so I better start off at Episode 3, and get back to the first one."

Reply

myrgthful May 18 2008, 19:40:51 UTC
Episode IV. And at least III had some interesting stuff in it...

But it didn't make up for the suckage of Episodes I and II, or the Ewoks in VI.

Reply

securebell May 18 2008, 21:52:21 UTC
Yea yea yea....Episode IV

Reply

j0idvivr May 19 2008, 00:06:06 UTC
Hey, I liked the Ewoks!!!

Reply


gigiss May 18 2008, 19:27:47 UTC
Qui-Gon thrusting his lightsaber through the blast door in the opening sequence = intense.

Swimming to the Gungan village was cool also.

But admittedly, those were mere moments in a lengthy film, a far-too-small proportion in the Coolness vs. Suckitude meter.

Reply

myrgthful May 18 2008, 19:39:27 UTC
Very true.... the lightsaber through the door trick was pretty cool.

Swimming to the Gungan village was interesting, but I dug the ride to the city of the Naboo through the Planet Core better... even though it was a special effects sequence, and wasn't important to the real story.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

myrgthful May 18 2008, 23:34:13 UTC
It actually gets better... II was slightly less inane. III was actually good in many parts.

Reply


j0idvivr May 18 2008, 21:43:03 UTC
The thing that ruined Ep 1 for me was JarJar Binks. If it weren't for him, the movie would've been 10,000x better. But, yeah, Darth Maul (Snake Eyes in the new G.I.Joe movie!), was definitely the saving grace for that movie.

Reply

j0idvivr May 18 2008, 21:47:03 UTC

Oh, and I forgot to mention - Before Narnia started last night, they had a little trivia thing goin' on. On it, they said that Ray Parks had no acting experience before Ep 1. He was actually there as a stunt coordinator for the light saber scenes. George Lucas was apparently so impressed with him, that he became Darth Maul. Now, that's pretty neat.

Reply

myrgthful May 18 2008, 23:32:16 UTC
Yup... like Andy Serkis with Gollum, Ray Parks just WAS the role. The directors had to use both men to the full of their abilities.

Reply

bernmarx May 19 2008, 02:45:36 UTC
Hey, I liked Jar Jar!

Reply


bernmarx May 19 2008, 02:04:27 UTC
I believe he was thinking, "I'll make a movie that I'll enjoy making and which will make some money." Which he did.

I enjoyed it, too. If you didn't, c'est la vie. *shrug*

Reply

myrgthful May 19 2008, 02:26:16 UTC
It's like comparing the first two Aliens movies against the latter two.

It's like if Kubrick or Kurosawa, or Wolfgang Petersen had become Verhoeven. Or worse, Uwe Boll.

Yeah, he had fun. Yeah, it was his franchise. But he disenchanted so many of us with the alteration of Jedi-ness into a Wagnerian concept of something you're born with, and not something you aspire to. His attempt to use annoyingly too-cute aliens for sickening comic relief undermined his storytelling.

Maybe, like Einstein, he lost his real spark after the early years.

Life will go on. But my love of Star Wars wanes, as a result.

Reply

bernmarx May 19 2008, 02:43:19 UTC
Everything else aside, you're simply not correct about how one becomes a Jedi. Luke and Leia are candidates to be Jedi because they're the children of a Jedi. That's clear in the first trilogy. If you missed it, well, too bad that Lucas's repetition of that disenchanted you, but it's blatantly there.

No, the second trilogy isn't of the same quality of the first one. Oh well. :)

And I happened to like Jar Jar Binks. The Phantom Menace was meant for kids. You're not a kid.

Reply

myrgthful May 19 2008, 02:47:43 UTC
::: Suddenly discovers his balding pate, potbelly and gray hair sticking out of odd orifices :::

CRAP.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up