Decades later, we're still having this debate.
First, in the Heller decision, the Supreme Court stated we do have a right to keep and bear arms. So that means, you are proposing to violate my civil rights. That's a dead end issue right there. If you're trying to find ways to violate my rights only to a certain degree in certain ways, you have to
(
Read more... )
Comments 7
Let's stop glorifying the murderers. Let's keep them off page 1. If you must describe the event on page 1, use it to describe the victims.
Let's deny the glory that these murderers crave.
It may not stop the first one, but it doesn't offer nearly as much satisfaction to the copy cats.
Reply
Or recognize them after their grave is repeatedly desecrated by the outraged.
Reply
Did you know that there was another mass shooting, just a few days before the one in CT? Happened in a mall in Oregon.
The shooter (whose name I have intentionally forgotten) managed to kill two and wound a third, before he saw a bystander by the name of Nick Meli (his name's worth remembering) draw his sidearm. Rather than be wounded and captured, the shooter ducked into a stairwell and gave his rifle a blowjob.
But you're not going to hear about that one on the news, most likely...
Reply
There was also the one where a gunman goes into a restaurant, then herds his victims into a theatre, before an off duty deputy sheriff plugs him. Don't recall the deputy's name, though.
Reply
Reply
It's available online.
I have it in PDF.
Reply
And frankly, being as obsessed with grammar and words as I am, I grow increasingly weary with the idiots of the world who claim verbally or in writing to want some particular admirable goal, when what they really want is something else entirely, which at best, is irrelevent to their claimed goal, and more often, is actually opposite to their claimed goal.
Reply
Leave a comment