Dismantling the Mouthbreather in Chief's Gun Policies

Jan 16, 2013 12:36


The following is a list, provided by the White House, of executive actions President Obama plans to take to address gun violence.

1. Issue a Presidential Memorandum to require federal agencies to make relevant data available to the federal background check system.

Meaning "nothing."  This is supposed to already exist.  The mass of the ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 8

septithol January 17 2013, 00:13:00 UTC
Mike, first of all, as someone with nasal problems that causes me to have to breath through my mouth most of the time (oddly enough my nose clears up when I am running, go figure), and who dislikes the idiocy of gun control, I resent the term 'mouthbreather' to describe our asshole-in-chief ( ... )

Reply


septithol January 17 2013, 07:14:39 UTC
Mike, I believe that you can tell a lot about a person by the sort of people they choose to surround themselves with, and/or the sort of people who support them. In the case of the asshole-in-chief, he is supported by people who voted for him based on his skin color, who have chosen not to live in the real world, who want to take away the rights of others, and/or who believe in magic energy and luxury beans whereby they can be given an endless pile of goodies that simply magically appear ( ... )

Reply


septithol January 20 2013, 00:08:05 UTC
Mike, I have decided that everyone who agrees with the asshole-in-chief on his assorted babblings (or should that be 'fartings'?) should be tied in a chair and forced to watch the first 10 minutes of Stanley Kubrick's movie "2001 - A Space Oddysey ( ... )

Reply


septithol January 21 2013, 12:15:53 UTC
Mike: You know, I get to wondering sometimes whether all the parents in Sandy Hook, or people who have suffered other tragedies, are actually clamoring for gun control, as portayed on television, or if the TV stations are simply selectively showing those people who have that opinion. Seeing things on TV often feels like being there, but it's not, really. You're seeing those selected parts of reality that someone chooses to show you, and they aren't under any professional obligation to show you or tell you about those parts of reality that might be in constrast to what they choose to show you ( ... )

Reply


the_dark_snack February 2 2013, 05:51:04 UTC
Happy Birthday!

Reply


Leave a comment

Up