It’s hard for me to think about this book without thinking about the way Hollywood mucked up the ending to the recent film. The test audience didn’t like the real ending, so they made it much happier, and much more Hollywood. It reduced the IAL vampires to common monsters-they left in that they set complex traps and whatnot, but then made them into
(
Read more... )
Comments 10
Reply
In a related point, the book obviously has a lot to do with identity as well. You talk about monotony and how Neville fills his time. The whole way through, he seems to be searching for his new -- or true? -- identity. In the end, happily enough, he finds it. >:)
I haven't seen any of the movie versions yet. Sounds like I shouldn't hurry.
How was THE PASSAGE? Other than the boring parts, I mean.
Finally, nice web humor. It makes me want to visit the post-apocalypse.
John Dixon
Reply
Did you say that the new film originally used the proper ending for this? How interesting! Is there anywhere we can see the clips, or were they never released?
Reply
nikki hopeman
Reply
I felt like the dog dying in the book was effective because it makes you see how truly alone he really is, and then when Ruth comes along you're pulling for her to be really a survivor and not a trap. It's just another in a long line of disappointments when it turns out not to be true.
Vermont may be safe from vampires/zombies, but you're not far enough away to escape the monster that is Hollywood!
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment