wee?

Apr 07, 2005 15:34

so i just read an article on how michaelangelos david is completely out of proportion. too bad its soo pretty! the article also revisits the idea again and again about how small his flacid little "wee" is. i mean, comeon guys. its pretty dinky. i mean, the rest of his junk hangs longer than it. thats sad. sad, sad, sad. but anywho. the writing also ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 2

yowsah April 7 2005, 13:40:44 UTC
they didn't teach you that in art history? about david? weird.

i mean, i think that people foget that "technically" he's in proportion because he was meant to be way up high on a pedestal or something. so it's funny that people spend time analyzing why he's built that way and think there's super deep meaning behind it, when really he'd be like..."sorry, guys, you're just displaying it wrong."

wow. art talk is lame.

Reply


japanbaby April 7 2005, 21:04:20 UTC
Happy Birthday! Yeaaaaaaaaaaaaah!

P.S. I need your addy to send you a postcard! (rabid squirrel noises!)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up