To my knowledge, you've never really WON an argument with me; I just stop replying.
The one argument you bring up specifically, the stuff about the kurds in Iraq, you replaced an article that was four years old with an article that undermined your argument about Iraq in the first place, and also pointed to future problems in the Kurdish areas.
I also found it amusing how you "won" that series of arguments by losing like seven times in a row, but always coming up with some caveat that makes each loss "not count", after the fact, until Chelsea had to go.
You seriously consider all the times I get bored with you to be victories?
So if you and I have a contest on which one of us can beat our head bloodiest against a wall and I quit. Who is the real loser in this situation and is it a contest worth winning?
Comments 4
The one argument you bring up specifically, the stuff about the kurds in Iraq, you replaced an article that was four years old with an article that undermined your argument about Iraq in the first place, and also pointed to future problems in the Kurdish areas.
I also found it amusing how you "won" that series of arguments by losing like seven times in a row, but always coming up with some caveat that makes each loss "not count", after the fact, until Chelsea had to go.
You seriously consider all the times I get bored with you to be victories?
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment