While reading
World War Z, I was doing some Wiki-hopping after looking up some things from the book, and landed on the entry for something that's interested me off and on for years:
language isolates. I really wish I had more of a facility for languages, because I find linguistics fascinating: how languages form, migrate, evolve, group into
(
Read more... )
Comments 20
In my theory class, we've been going over theories of language and communication and some of the stuff is so out there. Like in "subjective referential" the mind and consciousness creates the meaning for and object/experience. That's not a chair b/c you have experienced it being a chair; instead, it's a chair because the conscious recognizes it as a chair and gives meaning to that name and physicality. I still don't really even understand it and I probably left some of it out. Jung would sort of be a subjective referentialist, the belief in the collective thought and how we all know everything we will ever know, and that we are not learning or being taught but rather we are just being reminded we already know it.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Oh... I thought you meant maybe Zack Allen or Vir Cotto.
I think this whole thread will make much more sense after another glass or two of brevari.
Reply
Reply
?!?!?!?
*** faints ***
Reply
Reply
Reply
"Sumerian acts the same way as most languages Ryan may know in the first and second persons (e.g. "I beat" and "you beat") in the present and future tense, but in other forms it treats both the subject and the direct object as direct objects."
Yes that would probably make things terribly confusing to speak, but then again we don't see many Sumerians running around any more either ;)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
Leave a comment