[Camarilla] OWoD

Dec 11, 2009 09:16

Well it looks like we can, if we want, play OWoD Vampire instead of NWoD Vampire in either Cam/Anarch or Sabbat flavors ( Read more... )

camarilla

Leave a comment

Comments 6

khourytamarisk December 11 2009, 14:25:53 UTC
I'd play Werewolf if it were Apocalypse. Forsaken just lacks the story "oomph" for me. Same goes for Ling.

Reply

mrcorvin December 11 2009, 16:33:14 UTC
I would almost consider reupping for Apocalypse....

...seeing I had 2 primaries in Apocolypse and a kinfolk in the Mortals game in oWoD....

Reply


xenonhunter December 11 2009, 20:49:50 UTC
no...more....vampire. please....

That said, I agree. I'd play Apocalypse again.

Reply

netbard December 11 2009, 21:18:17 UTC
Well, I don't think our domain could support a second vampire game. I would strongly push (and this is me wearing my DC hat) that we have either one or the other.

That said - neat about Apocalypse. I've slowly come to the conclusion that its a better game.

Reply

hiroyuki_samson December 11 2009, 22:15:42 UTC
I don't know... I think that having a second game could work fine, dependant on how the rules were going to work, how decisions were made on venue theme and where other Rochester LARPs are. I could play Adrian one weekend and Tremere the Dooming another. Or Sabbat.

But... that's not something I'm ready to look at right now. I want a few more games of Requiem under our belt and to hear more about what the new venue is going to look like regionally and nationally before I make any decisions. (Puts on hat) As DST, however, I am open to listen to points going both ways and generally lean towards more games = good.

Reply

netbard December 11 2009, 22:21:49 UTC
Now, see, there's the thing. It really doesn't matter what the venue looks like regionally or nationally, as long as it gets some amount of support. Where I'm coming from is the idea that we already have three active venues within this domain, and a fourth venue that the vast majority of the domain travels to on a regular basis (Auburn). I know that people were considering trying to put in another venue when it went live (Geist). Adding a sixth venue on top of that would, I think, be somewhat problematic in terms of scheduling and site.

Personally, I can't be in that many venues. My concern is that that would hold true for a lot of the domain and our small domain would start to splinter, which would hardly help game attendance.

In the end - if there is support in the domain for running any given venue, I'm not going to say no. I am going to counsel caution in trying to over-load our gaming plates, however.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up