(Untitled)

May 02, 2009 18:47


Read more... )

hi, ckr

Leave a comment

Comments 5

c_regalis May 4 2009, 21:24:21 UTC
omg, you posted the paper in motion. I think that may be the most awesome thing I've seen this week. (And I saw a lot of awesome stuff. I was at FedCon! \c/)

Also, I wanted to know who John Wakefield was. so I checked out the first episode of the series. 7 years ago, 6 people were murdered by John Wakefield. That's the FIRST THING they are telling you. Oh Callum. *shakes head*

Reply

neu111 May 4 2009, 21:57:07 UTC
FedCon, Battlestar? Awesome! Hope you make a report soon!
And you still think paper Callum in motion is even more awesome? &hearts Just had to do it, he's just too pretty and moving in that pic!

7 years ago, 6 people were murdered by John Wakefield. That's the FIRST THING they are telling you.
Absolutely. And that makes me think that there's some hope he's not the killer after all. Cause, dumb as they may be, who the killer is seems to be the core of the suspense. Or, at least, he's just not today's killer, only the one 7 years ago. The one who was shot by a sheriff and had fallen off a cliff? how convenient, no? My conclusions: a) Wakefield's not dead, b) He may have been framed by the sheriff?

I wanted to know who John Wakefield was. so I checked out the first episode of the series.
I watched only the one he was in. And grabbed the previous ones. Hmm, for continuation purpose, if ever it's needed...

The first interesting google info on this is that Wakefield has a wiki page. He used to be a fisher ( ... )

Reply

c_regalis May 4 2009, 22:22:33 UTC
Battlestar, yes! And StarTrek and stuff. It was quite awesome. And I will post, probably tomorrow. But, yes, your moving paper was MORE awesome. ♥

About Callum in HI, yes. I thought about it too. I doubt that even(?) he can only sell his picture, I really do. So my guess is, he will show up. Maybe only in flash backs, possibly. OR. Maybe he was just framed for the murders 7 years ago? I mean, it's LEOBEN, everybody will totally believe it was him, but it WASN'T. (I am delusional, I know. I am still HOPING OKAY?)

So, yeah, big hope, maybe, possibly, probably he is not dead. He actually fell of a cliff? After watching the first episode that was totally what I was going for. Or, uhm, is it just what you hope as well? *confused now* I am through with the second episode and nothing about cliffs so far. (Also, you kind of can get into it. If you try really hard. Which is what I do. So, PLEASE, no Callum being able to just sell his picture. It was too much work already.) And, yeah, maybe he WAS the murderer 7 years ago, but not now. I ( ... )

Reply

neu111 May 5 2009, 20:28:30 UTC
HOPING and GRASPING, same here.

He actually fell of a cliff?
That's what I understood from the wiki page, and from there, from the Harper's Globe clips. Shot and fell. Body conveniently identified by the eeeeeeeevil sheriff. Who probably wronged him already 17 years before the first murders, when he was a peaceful crab-fisherman and got sent to jail. Came back for revenge and got framed. Currently licking his wounds and ready to re-appear in the last episode when he'll reveal the full plot hercule poirot-wise and will end up alive and the hero. With flashbacks in-between leading the gullible watchers to believe he is the murderer.

Hmpf, yes?

Reply


Leave a comment

Up