Facebook and Twitter Connect, Pingbacks

Aug 31, 2010 18:16


We've got some exciting updates this week, so sit tight and we'll get started. Of course, news would not be complete without a special gift from Frank. It appears that he neglected to celebrate birthdays this month. So, in the spirit of better late than never, please rip a zippy yippee if you were born in August, and Frank'll send you a ginger ( Read more... )

frankandmeme, photophile, pingbacks, facebook and twitter connect, repost tags, webmoney

Leave a comment

blue_ant September 1 2010, 03:17:12 UTC
All right, LJ. I tried this out. I have a locked LJ, so does my sister. With her permission, I turned on the twitter connect and commented on one of her locked posts and reposted it to twitter. Not only does that work, but you include the text of the comment -- posted in a LOCKED post -- as well as a link to the post. Sure, it's locked, but why is this even possible? Why allow this feature since the people who're looking at the post potentially aren't on LJ and thus not friends with people with locked posts?

Please, please allow us to opt out: getting rid of the repost links, as well as the ability of others to repost comments on OUR posts (in personal LJs and communities). Also, fix the / tag thing while you're at it. And bring back the feature that allowed someone to turn off comment notifications -- but not when we reply to a comment within the post.

But mostly, please turn off (or allow ME to turn off) the ability of others to invade my privacy.

Reply

chaobell September 1 2010, 03:21:20 UTC
Ugh.

LJ, why the fuck would you allow people to publicly crosspost replies to locked content? What miscarriage of common fucking sense could have possibly led to that boneheaded maneuver?

Reply

blue_ant September 1 2010, 03:22:40 UTC
That's what I want to know, too. I actually didn't think it'd work until I tried it. I hate even more that it posts some (all in my case, because the comment was very short) of the content of the comment.

Reply

commieprincess September 1 2010, 03:21:46 UTC
What she said. Why allow for friends-lock and filters on specific entries if anyone can comment and publish that comment all over?

Reply

FIX THIS LJ carnality September 1 2010, 03:21:57 UTC
jesus christ ):

Reply

twitchywrote September 1 2010, 03:28:20 UTC
So, wait, there's no way for you to set your journal to actually prevent that from happening, period?

Reply

blue_ant September 1 2010, 03:29:58 UTC
Not that I know of, no. An LJ friend of mine write a post saying if she found out people were reposting comments posted on her LJ, she'd ban them. Which seems to be the only option as of right now.

I wish, like with the stats thing, we could disable it and make sure no one else can repost their comments on OUR posts. But I have no idea if that'll happen.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

blue_ant September 1 2010, 03:43:22 UTC
That's why I had to try it. Because I didn't REALLY believe LJ would do that. And yet ... they did.

Reply

sonadora9 September 1 2010, 04:02:38 UTC
Thank you for testing this. It's my primary concern.

And it needs to be changed.

Reply

whatifoundthere September 1 2010, 04:51:25 UTC

... )

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

moonlight69 September 1 2010, 05:10:41 UTC
According to the original news announcement, screened comments are also cross-postable.

Reply

blue_ant September 1 2010, 14:10:07 UTC
Yeah, I had my sister check this out and it's definitely cross-postable too. I suppose the only way to avoid this is to disable LJ comments -- which defeats the purpose of LJ!

Reply

skreidle September 1 2010, 14:48:25 UTC
Makes sense, inasmuch as the comment's author is the one who controls where it goes, not the recipient.

Reply

cho_malfoy September 1 2010, 05:06:35 UTC
Thanks for doing this. And +1 for the "But mostly, please turn off (or allow ME to turn off) the ability of others to invade my privacy." sentiment.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up