On Religion

Apr 08, 2011 22:38

walrusjester, you bring out my verbosity. And so here's my story. I've told it before several times, so those of you who have heard me babble... well, skim the first paragraph and you'll know if you need to read more.

Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 7

lupasumo April 11 2011, 02:53:45 UTC
This article was vey helpful to me. It helped me to be informed and more aware. The details were such a blessing, thanks.

Reply


walrusjester April 11 2011, 14:57:28 UTC
If I understand your analogy correctly, the forms of religion would be useful because they'd allow you to get back into the practice of that religion. But couldn't you have the religion without the forms in the first place? Then getting back into the practice wouldn't be so difficult for you. Or do I misunderstand?

Reply

ng_nighthawk April 11 2011, 16:17:35 UTC
Well, I had the understanding that you needed the comprehension of the reasons behind the practice to make a practice meaningful. But what I discovered is that for really complex stuff, the opposite approach works better--you dive into the practice, and then the comprehension follows ( ... )

Reply

walrusjester April 11 2011, 19:14:55 UTC
But once you're into the religion, why would you *keep* following the forms? Aside from those forms which we could call "sacramental" because they're intrinsically necessary to the religion, why bother? It seems to me that the logical goal, even for an adherent of a specific tradition, would be to strip away all the non-sacramental practices over time in order to have as few barriers as possible between oneself and God.

Interestingly, I came at this subject from the perspective that a religion *with* forms turns into an exercise without impact on daily life. I'm tempted to chalk it up to the differences in our upbringing, but I might worry at that bone for a while anyway.

Your second problem raises a good point. I'm prone to intellectualizing religion. I think it's important, even required, to do exactly that - the unexamined dogma is not worth believing, if you will. That approach can exclude people, and I'll consider the ramifications of that.

Then again, deism doesn't exactly have a lot to exclude people from.

Reply

ng_nighthawk April 11 2011, 20:19:53 UTC
Wait, a sudden thought ( ... )

Reply


lupasumo April 12 2011, 15:49:11 UTC
Great work keep it coming, best blog on earth

Reply


Leave a comment

Up