(no subject)
Well...that just seems...odd. o.O
Was reading Thralls' entry on Wowpedia, and while I was making faces at the Aggra thing, I was reading a paragraph that had to deal with I guess events in the Shattering Novel (which I've yet to read). In regards to a rather nasty attack on some Night Elves, this was summarized: [Thrall] received a letter from King Varian Wrynn demanding to denounce the attacks and turn over any attackers he can find to the Alliance for justice. Thrall refused to turn over violators of the treaty (he had suspects but didn't have proof and it would also hurt orc morale) and also refused to apologize for the thievery of the Night Elves' goods, the murders, or the brutal methods in which they were performed. Though he did express anger that the treaty had been violated, his unwillingness to rebuke those who use brutal methods to assault Alliance members has weakened his popularity with Alliance leaders.
IDK. But that doesn't sound very...Thrallish? Did he get Character Derailed in that book or what? :oa Thoughts? I guess I can understand the not wanting to turn over anyone without proof, but the refusal to apologize, apparently of what was described? Maybe I just totally /don't/ have a grasp on him at all anymore, but Like I said, that just seems....Odd.
Was reading Thralls' entry on Wowpedia, and while I was making faces at the Aggra thing, I was reading a paragraph that had to deal with I guess events in the Shattering Novel (which I've yet to read). In regards to a rather nasty attack on some Night Elves, this was summarized: [Thrall] received a letter from King Varian Wrynn demanding to denounce the attacks and turn over any attackers he can find to the Alliance for justice. Thrall refused to turn over violators of the treaty (he had suspects but didn't have proof and it would also hurt orc morale) and also refused to apologize for the thievery of the Night Elves' goods, the murders, or the brutal methods in which they were performed. Though he did express anger that the treaty had been violated, his unwillingness to rebuke those who use brutal methods to assault Alliance members has weakened his popularity with Alliance leaders.
IDK. But that doesn't sound very...Thrallish? Did he get Character Derailed in that book or what? :oa Thoughts? I guess I can understand the not wanting to turn over anyone without proof, but the refusal to apologize, apparently of what was described? Maybe I just totally /don't/ have a grasp on him at all anymore, but Like I said, that just seems....Odd.