There’s a push to get people to stop using the word. The “R” word. The word that is used in a derogatory way to describe people diagnosed as having intellectual disabilities, which we used to call mental retardation, and that is also used to put-down people, things, ideas and all other manner of nouns. The
push comes from Special Olympics, a
(
Read more... )
Comments 14
also you're familiar with Lydia Brown's extensive writings on terms to avoid on these grounds, right?
Reply
Steven Pinker, not previously but the "euphemism treadmill" is an apt term here. I particularly liked the comment that we will know if headway is being made on reducing prejudice when the terms stop changing. I hadn't thought of it that way before, but I find myself agreeing.
Reply
Pinker is by no means the only person to discuss this kind of issue - this was just the example that came to mind for me.
Reply
Reply
Reply
(The comment has been removed)
That's where the whole politically correct group came up with terms like "differently abled" and "handicapable." I have yet to meet the adult with a disability who can say the word "handicapable" with a straight face.
Reply
This post also touches a bit on why I don't really like politically correct language. The underlying issue is attitudes, and shuffling around words isn't going to change that.
Yes, exactly!
Reply
Reply
We would probably still have words to describe the inability or difficulty to do things that most people are able to do, just for convenience sake. We might have a word for blind, to describe an eye, just as we have words like green and brown to describe eyes. But we wouldn't need to have an overall collection of those words under "disability." I think that in some of my medical anthropology books they talk about how some cultures that are less product oriented, they tend to have individual impairment words but no overall disability concept.
Reply
Leave a comment