Comments | nlb87: (без темы)

nlb87

(Untitled)

May 01, 2005 01:10

im so fucking tired of dealing with your crap. im tired of dealing with your pettiness. your fakeness. and your dishonesty. im tired of the way you treat me. im tired of two-facedness and silent disapprovals ( Read more... )

Comments 8

pep553 May 1 2005, 07:15:28 UTC

I have been more patient with you than anyone in history. I have tried so hard to help you with everything, I have put so many things aside to pick up the phone and answer you, to do everything in my power to help you. I have sat through conversations just wondering if maybe you'd ask me how my day was or how my life was merely to be ignored ( ... )

hooded_empath May 1 2005, 15:41:11 UTC

I am fully aware that most of this post is none of my business to answer. Most of this is between you, Chris, and your relationship- something that I have always recognized, respected, and acknowledged. What more can you want than that ( ... )

nlb87 May 1 2005, 21:53:56 UTC

miko, based on what chris wrote and an assumption you both made, i can understand your reaction(s). but i should like you both to know that this post was NOT entirely directed at either of you. in fact, less than one line was and its not to both of you ( ... )

pep553 May 2 2005, 02:31:00 UTC

Well I thought about that but there were so many things that you had just told me that made sense in context. Much of that was directly quoted from what you had said to me hence me thinking it was about me.

in fact:
"if ive come to you, its so that you could tell me how it works, to point me in some sort of direction, if not your own. to comfort me or just to be brutally upfront. im not always looking for sympathy, sometimes just an ear. im sorry you're equally tired of listening. im sry its taken you so long to say so. and why is it ok for some to but not for me/others?" seemed like an extension of the conversation.
btw "u is not the same person" doesn't make sense ! :-)

nlb87 May 2 2005, 11:42:15 UTC

"so many" ?? Eek. I should I hope I hadn't said most of that during our convo...?!
i meant to also say in my last comment. the bit about "all over each other" is most DEFINATLY NOT (i wish i could bold and underline that) at you!
and having brought it up, i will extend (this isn't to you chris)
I am SICK and TIRED of seeing so much sex (i use the word liberally) at all of the get togethers. Sweets, the 1950s and 60s have passed and the hippy days are more or less over (no offense to all others to whom this doesn't apply who remain hippies). While I can have quite a tollerance for such things, its gotten to the point where it's more than inappropriate...it's obnoxious, inconsiderate, rude, and almost vulgare. I am not saying this because I no longer am with anyone and therefore am in need or jealous. I felt this while I had one too. Chris, you and Miko are in fact perhaps the most PC and you NEVER crossed my mind when I made the comment.
We still have something to clear up - but NOT on lj (chris).

daphneflower May 2 2005, 15:24:11 UTC

this post is vague, but angry. i don't know who you are talking to, can't read much of it as directed at me. but i know i got really upset and blasted you out yesterday, so could understand if much of it is.

in general i think that posting these sorts of things, in which you won't come out and say who you are mad at and why, are a bad idea and a bit nasty. i'm not so upset anymore, knowing it was a misunderstanding and letting it go. but if some of this is at me then we should talk. my cell may be lost, but i do have a house.

nlb87 May 2 2005, 17:44:52 UTC

this post was made before you got upset with me.
it is vague. i admit. however, i have said why i am mad, while not saying who i am mad at.
perhaps its not fair. but livejournal is the place for us to post our thoughts/ideas. the reader doesn't HAVE to comment, nor does the reader have to think its directed at him/her.
This post is not directed towards a specific person, rather a larger group and is more about our general behavior towards each other.

daphneflower May 2 2005, 20:58:59 UTC

"nor does the reader have to think its directed at him/her"? livejournal is a form of communication and i think your usage here is really inapropriate. you have at least two people who, mistakingly, think you are directing it at them which i do not believe is a choice, but rather a consequence of your vagueness. if you don't mind saying "this post is not directed towards a specific person, rather a larger group and is more about our general behavior towards each other" why don't you? i'm not trying to say you can't use lj however you see fit, but i think it's a bit of a... well...faux pas.