Proportional Representation in Edmonton Centre

Jan 23, 2006 14:39

This is long overdue, and some of you will have heard the tale in person, but if I wait any longer it'll be completely irrelevant ( Read more... )

"proportional representation" election 2

Leave a comment

Comments 5

hubris2 January 23 2006, 22:10:55 UTC
Correct me if I'm wrong...but at present the rural districts have more 'power' per vote than urban districts as a single riding represents a smaller number of people, especially in the west. I believe the conservative party has a larger basis of support among the rural voters, so it would make sense that a Liberal in a urban riding would support PR. Perhaps she also believes in election reform, but specifically this would also help her and her party at the federal level.

Reply

buhrger January 23 2006, 22:57:41 UTC
tho the liberals have also won majorities of which PR would have deprived them. PR in general is going to be seen as a bad idea by any party that expects to win a majority at the polls under the current system. admittedly, we seem to be running out of those kinds of parties...

Reply


buhrger January 23 2006, 22:59:23 UTC
she feels that PR would reduce the level of negative campaigning!
once the parties start to understand the difference between "minority" and "coalition", i could see that.

Reply

therealjae January 25 2006, 00:10:26 UTC
They'd figure it out eventually. They'd have no choice. It'd be an awfully rocky adjustment period, though.

-J

Reply

buhrger January 25 2006, 00:41:55 UTC
yup. more blood sports. tasty, tasty blood....

Reply


Leave a comment

Up