ix. [text]

Jun 30, 2009 23:09

By processing the available crime statistics for the city, I have discovered an interesting anomaly ( Read more... )

angry eru is angry

Leave a comment

Comments 74

[screened || unhackable] igotajobforyou July 1 2009, 08:42:47 UTC
You're pretty damn loud for a man who isn't doing much, L.

Reply

[screened || unhackable] non_veritas July 1 2009, 08:44:18 UTC
You should be aware, more than anyone, that whoever brought me here has seen to it that I am unable to do much. The lack of strong security in my living situation, for example.

Reply

[screened || unhackable] igotajobforyou July 1 2009, 08:45:29 UTC
Aren't you supposed to be some kind of genius?

Reply

[screened || unhackable] non_veritas July 1 2009, 08:48:50 UTC
It would be foolish to bring a knife to a gunfight.

In the figurative sense, I have been left with nothing but butter knives, and you -- or your superiors -- are well aware of it.

Reply


[audio: screened, unhackable] sevenofnine July 2 2009, 08:05:24 UTC
If the statistics do not read naturally, then they are falsified, or the conditions themselves are unnatural. It would not be the first indication that both cities are controlled environments, down to the finer details.

I would normally credit the Undercity residents with being more aware than their topside counterparts, but if the psychological compulsion to light fires is conspicuously absent -- we must consider whether that was done to them, and for what purpose.

[Seven's terse on the other topic; doesn't like the mental images.]

I find any violence between residents unproductive. I have no further opinion at this time. What do you propose to do?

Reply

[audio: screened, unhackable] non_veritas July 2 2009, 08:51:29 UTC
Yes. They indicate something being out of whack, but I am not sure what. There is no population anomaly -- no unusually low rate of the people who are statistically most likely to commit arson, for example.

[There's a soft huff of breath, a sigh, and then he continues in a more direct and personal tone.]

Please keep this to yourself, Seven. I spoke to the Informant.

Reply

[audio: screened, unhackable] sevenofnine July 2 2009, 21:37:22 UTC
People who are statistically most likely to commit arson. I am unsure who that would be. A certain age group, or a socioeconomic one?

If necessary, I will lie by omission. [She has almost no sense of humor but a very long memory to work with, for the purposes of crafting in-jokes. It's redudant to say she won't raise the topic.]

He deigns to communicate without issuing orders?

[She does see the job offers as orders, albeit orders with no penalty for failure to comply. They have every reason to take work when it's offered. It feels less optional, being the obvious correct choice.]

Will you summarize the conversation?

Reply

[audio: screened, unhackable] non_veritas July 3 2009, 00:15:23 UTC
It can depend on the motivation for setting the fire -- insurance fraud, for example, has a different kind of perpetrator -- but typically, we would be speaking of young males.

[A hesitant pause, while he decides whether to summarize what he said, or simply allow her to see it.]

Yes, he answered my message. It has never happened before, except when I have responded to his messages. The text will follow.

[He doesn't seem able to forward messages, so he skims through them, taking notes. What he sends to her as text a few minutes later is a largely accurate reconstruction of his communication with the Informant, though a few words are changed or elided here and there.]

Reply


[Audio -- screened||unhackable] greyedfront July 4 2009, 03:18:28 UTC
He is not here currently.

Reply

[Audio -- screened||unhackable] non_veritas July 4 2009, 07:23:31 UTC
[L sighs; he sounds bored with the whole affair.]

Thank you, Ishida, but I have heard from him. He is alive and keeping to himself.

Please keep this information private. It seems his life is in danger.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up