(no subject)
more bible
tree of knowledge of good and evil stuff (mainly ownership)
avoid if you believe you should
For alignment purposes I intend to refer to
- "Genesis" as first book
- Characters of first book as
- 'creative character' (the creative character of the first book)
- 'allowed characters' (the characters who are told what to do by the creative character)
- 'not straight foreword character' (who represent the creator of the text most)
Bible (mainly gensis)
- give concept of ownership
- 'creative character' created much and acts as though is assigned right to allow or not allow others to his creation
- 'creative character' portrayed as kind initially to 'allowed characters'
- 'creative character' assigns one restriction to 'allowed characters'
- 'creative character' acts justified to do as he pleases to those who do not obey his restrictions of his creations
- 'allowed character' do not grant 'creative character' right to allow or not allow others to his creation
- 'allowed characters' grant 'creative character' right to do as he pleases to those who do not follow restrictions of his creations
Thus aligning toward text - all characters not simply one of them
- aligning to 'creative character' gives you concept - "I create it - none have right to it except through me"
- aligning to 'allowed characters' gives you concept - "others have right to not be kind if we do not respect their right over their creation"
Not straight foreword statement from a not straight foreword book (given nature of word)
- 'creative character' is basicaly referred to as 'G-o-d'
- People reading text possibly assign 'G-o-d' to a type of being instead of a singular being (polytheism)
- People perhaps thinking character is a 'god'
- Bible is basically monothestic
- Thus 'G-o-d' is basically assigned the value equivalent to a name through the bible
- Looking and hearing the word 'Gods' there is a difference between 'Gods' (polytheistic) and 'God's' (name ownership)
- Statement basically from bible (the not straight foreword statement from the 'not straight foreword character') "...you will be as Gods knowing good and evil"
- Could interpret value of statement to be - "To eat the tree is be a 'God'" (polytheistic value 'god')
- Given context of bible (in wholeynes) statement probably is - "To eat the tree is to grant 'God' ownership over you" (name ownership value 'God')
- Thus further enforcing ownership and 'creative characters' right over 'creative characters' creation (alliteration)
- Basic reader text alignment - "To eat any I create without me giving you right to it give me ownership over you"
Genesis of "first book"
- "first book" grant concept of ownership
- "tree" of "first book" seemingly represent a material creation
- material creation represent material and intellectual
- we align to any we read to an extent
- thus "first book" seemingly generate people who obsess over property both material and intellectual
'Tree of Life'
- after 'allowed characters' accept 'creative character' right over them
- creative character states allowed characters are not allowed to eat of 'tree of life'
- thus showing 'creative character' does have right 'allowed characters'
- 'creative character' basically states 'allowed characters' will 'work'
- further showing they are not free
- Basic reader text alignment - reader not allowed much life and not restricted from work (I state it in such a way to be somewhat positive)
Creater of text
- basically seek ownership
- given not straight foreword approach basically seek ownership of readers (without their consent and regardless if they are innocent)
tree of knowledge of good and evil stuff (mainly ownership)
avoid if you believe you should
For alignment purposes I intend to refer to
- "Genesis" as first book
- Characters of first book as
- 'creative character' (the creative character of the first book)
- 'allowed characters' (the characters who are told what to do by the creative character)
- 'not straight foreword character' (who represent the creator of the text most)
Bible (mainly gensis)
- give concept of ownership
- 'creative character' created much and acts as though is assigned right to allow or not allow others to his creation
- 'creative character' portrayed as kind initially to 'allowed characters'
- 'creative character' assigns one restriction to 'allowed characters'
- 'creative character' acts justified to do as he pleases to those who do not obey his restrictions of his creations
- 'allowed character' do not grant 'creative character' right to allow or not allow others to his creation
- 'allowed characters' grant 'creative character' right to do as he pleases to those who do not follow restrictions of his creations
Thus aligning toward text - all characters not simply one of them
- aligning to 'creative character' gives you concept - "I create it - none have right to it except through me"
- aligning to 'allowed characters' gives you concept - "others have right to not be kind if we do not respect their right over their creation"
Not straight foreword statement from a not straight foreword book (given nature of word)
- 'creative character' is basicaly referred to as 'G-o-d'
- People reading text possibly assign 'G-o-d' to a type of being instead of a singular being (polytheism)
- People perhaps thinking character is a 'god'
- Bible is basically monothestic
- Thus 'G-o-d' is basically assigned the value equivalent to a name through the bible
- Looking and hearing the word 'Gods' there is a difference between 'Gods' (polytheistic) and 'God's' (name ownership)
- Statement basically from bible (the not straight foreword statement from the 'not straight foreword character') "...you will be as Gods knowing good and evil"
- Could interpret value of statement to be - "To eat the tree is be a 'God'" (polytheistic value 'god')
- Given context of bible (in wholeynes) statement probably is - "To eat the tree is to grant 'God' ownership over you" (name ownership value 'God')
- Thus further enforcing ownership and 'creative characters' right over 'creative characters' creation (alliteration)
- Basic reader text alignment - "To eat any I create without me giving you right to it give me ownership over you"
Genesis of "first book"
- "first book" grant concept of ownership
- "tree" of "first book" seemingly represent a material creation
- material creation represent material and intellectual
- we align to any we read to an extent
- thus "first book" seemingly generate people who obsess over property both material and intellectual
'Tree of Life'
- after 'allowed characters' accept 'creative character' right over them
- creative character states allowed characters are not allowed to eat of 'tree of life'
- thus showing 'creative character' does have right 'allowed characters'
- 'creative character' basically states 'allowed characters' will 'work'
- further showing they are not free
- Basic reader text alignment - reader not allowed much life and not restricted from work (I state it in such a way to be somewhat positive)
Creater of text
- basically seek ownership
- given not straight foreword approach basically seek ownership of readers (without their consent and regardless if they are innocent)