(no subject)
"in the begining the word was 'god' and the word was with 'god'"
seem to currently make the most sense to me is
referring to 'god' as 'creative character' to maintain clearity
"in the begining the word was 'creative character' and the word was with 'creative character'"
perhaps
'creative character' put forth a statement
the statement is referred to as 'the word'
the statement originally represent 'creative character' because 'creative character' put it forth
the statement then begin to represent others who put it forth
thus the statement is without representation of 'creative character'
"in the begining the word was 'creative character'"
perhaps
'creative character' thought of the statement before putting it forth
'creative character' then put the statement forth
the statement then is with others
the statement as though a moving entity is away from 'creative character'
"and the word was with 'creative character'"
thus perhaps
the statement of "in the begining the word was 'creative character' and the word was with 'creative character'" seem to be about statement
seems to empower statements to be similar to living beings
the statement does little with regard to 'creative character'
any character or name could be placed there and the statement would hold similar value
thus the statement represents statements not 'creative character'
the statement somewhat shows statements represent those they are directly from
thus if the statement was conveyed to you be someone other than 'creative character' then the statement represents someone other than 'creative character'
from my perspective someone other than 'creative character' conveyed the message thus the book represent someone other than 'creative character' and represent message other than message of 'creative character'
seem to currently make the most sense to me is
referring to 'god' as 'creative character' to maintain clearity
"in the begining the word was 'creative character' and the word was with 'creative character'"
perhaps
'creative character' put forth a statement
the statement is referred to as 'the word'
the statement originally represent 'creative character' because 'creative character' put it forth
the statement then begin to represent others who put it forth
thus the statement is without representation of 'creative character'
"in the begining the word was 'creative character'"
perhaps
'creative character' thought of the statement before putting it forth
'creative character' then put the statement forth
the statement then is with others
the statement as though a moving entity is away from 'creative character'
"and the word was with 'creative character'"
thus perhaps
the statement of "in the begining the word was 'creative character' and the word was with 'creative character'" seem to be about statement
seems to empower statements to be similar to living beings
the statement does little with regard to 'creative character'
any character or name could be placed there and the statement would hold similar value
thus the statement represents statements not 'creative character'
the statement somewhat shows statements represent those they are directly from
thus if the statement was conveyed to you be someone other than 'creative character' then the statement represents someone other than 'creative character'
from my perspective someone other than 'creative character' conveyed the message thus the book represent someone other than 'creative character' and represent message other than message of 'creative character'