Goblet of Fire gripe, and new-old clothes, and mushy monologues.

[obbiku]

I am disappointed. Goblet of Fire was like a .... if they actually made a movie of the book, and then you were watching it on DVD, and you fast forward it. It's like that. I'd say the movie was only about 3 chapters of the whole book, which definitely consisted of more than 3 chapters. Basically, these are the thing the movie did

Comments

[lunajile]

That new coat of yours is hawt (but of course). I hope it's easy to take off ;)

I have the large piccy from kink night

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v40/lunajile/wife.jpg

[panda00]

They left Winky out? And S.P.E.W.? And Rita Skeeter? Did they at least do the beginning right, where the Weasleys come to the Dursleys to get Harry, but find they can't get through the blocked fireplace, and then Fred and George feed Dudley a ton-tongue toffee...? What about Barty Crouch (Jr., I mean)...do they keep his whole storyline in there? I don't imagine they'd be able to without Winky. I don't see how the movie could even be REMOTELY like the book if Winky wasn't in it. O__o;;;;

I want to boycott the Harry Potter movies because they do such a bad job on them, but I just CAN'T. I'm too much of a fangirl. Damnit. *goes off to pout*

[obbiku]

NO! FUCK. The beginning started with the Quidditch Cup and the Death's Mark.
I HATE THE MOVIE SO SO MUCH.

Stupid non-following-book-ness. Gur.