5 Fun thoughts

[odin1970]

1. Abortion: Very simply I believe if it has a heart beat its alive. If you terminate the heart beat you are thus killing a live being. If females are allowed the right to choose when they can kill, why cant I? I am pro choice but my preference would be to allow the child to live to an age where it could defend itself and then kill it (or attempt

Comments

[safirekat]

1. I agree abortion is wrong, but who the fuck am I to force someone to be pregnant and carry a life they very probably will discard.

2. Yup

3. The answer to your last sentence is Yes in my opinion, and no, I did not breastfeed and I didn't agree with any 'sit-ins' that took place when ex-pregnant women got all self-righteous.

4. I have no issue with violence without malice.

5. So many people miss the point, don't they.

[odin1970]

Regarding 1. Premeditated killing for convience might not be a popular portrayl of abortion or unwanted pregnancy but my issue is one of equity. If we can allow the right to kill for females why cant I as the male have the same right? If I knock someone up I am expected to toe the line, provide for the child and the mother.

Why cant I kill that unborn child under the same premise of convience or means?

Regarding 3. My biggest struggle with this issue has always been the child being nurished. I teeter on this one because I think its a valid claim and might perserve the inequity. Yet, I could claim that not being able to urinate in a timely manner might be deteremental. I live in MA and the state is in the process of legalizing (Im not sure it was illegal honestly) of public breast feeding.

[safirekat]

Regarding 1: I don't necessarily disagree with you. I don't think that men with no previous connection to the woman should always be held responsible. I'm also not sure where or how one could draw that line.

Thank you for teetering on #3.