these colors don't run
as a courtesy i'm putting this under a lj-cut. but do check it out if you're at all interested...
so you call yourself a liberal. here is what your party stands for:
you think it's okay to go to war without the world's approval when bill clinton is president, but not when george w. bush is.
you protest the gathering of the republican national convention, thereby infringing on the first amendment right to assembly.
you give michael moore, a left-wing extremist, the seat of honor and a speech at your own convention, yet you demand that president bush condemn the swift boat veterans.
you like to think you are tolerant of all races and cultures, yet you try to eliminate god and religion from every aspect of public life and routinely disrespect and offend christianity.
you do nothing when the women in afghanistan are forbidden from showing their face and can be murdered at the whim of men with impunity, yet you are enraged when the very perpetrators of these crimes are detained at guantanamo bay, where they live in better conditions than they did in the middle east (yes, it's true, do the research).
you protest the war in vietnam, and then support a presidential candidate who fought in it, but who as a veteran called his fellow soldiers "babykillers," and then wore his service on his sleeve during his presidential campaign.
you support a party that calls raising taxes "good for you," and if you think i'm making this up, i'm not. look up hillary clinton's speeches.
you support a party that thinks blacks and minorities aren't smart enough or able to compete with whites, so you lower standards for them.
you have no problem with killing a fetus in its third trimester, when it's able to survive on its own, yet you are against the death penalty for murderers.
and finally, you don't realize that your iconic paradigm of the democratic party, john f. kennedy, would be a republican by today's standards.
so you call yourself a liberal. here is what your party stands for:
you think it's okay to go to war without the world's approval when bill clinton is president, but not when george w. bush is.
you protest the gathering of the republican national convention, thereby infringing on the first amendment right to assembly.
you give michael moore, a left-wing extremist, the seat of honor and a speech at your own convention, yet you demand that president bush condemn the swift boat veterans.
you like to think you are tolerant of all races and cultures, yet you try to eliminate god and religion from every aspect of public life and routinely disrespect and offend christianity.
you do nothing when the women in afghanistan are forbidden from showing their face and can be murdered at the whim of men with impunity, yet you are enraged when the very perpetrators of these crimes are detained at guantanamo bay, where they live in better conditions than they did in the middle east (yes, it's true, do the research).
you protest the war in vietnam, and then support a presidential candidate who fought in it, but who as a veteran called his fellow soldiers "babykillers," and then wore his service on his sleeve during his presidential campaign.
you support a party that calls raising taxes "good for you," and if you think i'm making this up, i'm not. look up hillary clinton's speeches.
you support a party that thinks blacks and minorities aren't smart enough or able to compete with whites, so you lower standards for them.
you have no problem with killing a fetus in its third trimester, when it's able to survive on its own, yet you are against the death penalty for murderers.
and finally, you don't realize that your iconic paradigm of the democratic party, john f. kennedy, would be a republican by today's standards.