(no subject)

Dec 08, 2006 02:06



By SETH BORENSTEIN, AP Science Writer1 hour, 36 minutes ago

In a "sneak peak" revealing a grim side effect of future warmer seas, new
NASA satellite data find that the vital base of the ocean food web shrinks
when the world's seas get hotter.

And that discovery has scientists worried about how much food marine life
will have as global warming progresses.

The data show a significant link between warmer water ‹ either from the El
Nino weather phenomenon or global warming ‹ and reduced production of
phytoplankton of the world's oceans, according to a study in Thursday's
journal Nature.

Phytoplankton are the microscopic plant life that zooplankton and other
marine animals eat, essentially the grain crop of the world's oceans.

Study lead author Michael Behrenfeld, a biological oceanographer at Oregon
State University, said Wednesday that the recent dramatic drop in
phytoplankton production in much of the world's oceans is a "sneak peak of
how ocean biology" will respond later in the century with global warming.

"Everything else up the food web is going to be impacted," said
oceanographer Scott Doney of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institute. He was
not involved in the study.

"What's worrisome is that small changes that happen in the bottom of the
food web can have dramatic changes to certain species at higher spots on the
food chain," Doney said.

This is yet another recent scientific study with real-time data showing the
much predicted harmful effects of global warming are not just coming, but in
some cases are already here and can be tallied scientifically, researchers
said.

A satellite commissioned by NASA tracked water temperature and the
production of phytoplankton from 1997 to 2006, finding that for most of the
world's oceans when one went up the other went down and vice versa,
Behrenfeld said.

As water temperatures increased from 1999 to 2004, the crop of phytoplankton
dropped significantly, about 200 million tons a year. On average about 50
billion tons of phytoplankton are produced yearly, Behrenfeld said.

During that time, some ocean regions, especially around the equator in the
Pacific, saw as much as a 50 percent drop in phytoplankton production, he
said.

However, the satellite first started taking measurements in 1997 when water
temperatures were at their warmest due to El Nino. That's the regular
cyclical warming of part of the Pacific Ocean that affects climate
worldwide.

After that year, the ocean significantly cooled until 1999 and the
phytoplankton crop soared by 2 billion tons during those two years.

"The results are showing this very tight coupling between production and
climate," Behrenfeld said.

As less food is produced by phytoplankton the oceans get bluer in color, he
noted.

Phytoplankton, which turn sunlight into food, need nutrients such as
nitrogen, phosphates and iron from colder water below, Behrenfeld said. With
warmer surface water, it is harder for the phytoplankton to get those
nutrients.

Other oceanographers agree with the El Nino link but said that with only a
decade of data it is harder to make global warming connections.

"It's something you certainly can't ignore, because its potential is quite
significant," said the Woods Hole Institute's James Yoder. "But there are
some caveats because of the shortness of the record."

Behrenfeld said his study verifies the physical mechanism ‹ how
phytoplankton react to warm water ‹ that has been predicted in computer
models, thus verifying dire warnings.

Another worry is that with reduced phytoplankton, the world's oceans will
suck up less carbon dioxide, increasing the Earth's chief global warming
gas, said NASA ocean biology project manager Paula Bontempi. That's because
phytoplankton take carbon dioxide out of the atmosphere in making food.

This is at least the third significant peer-reviewed research paper in the
past six months showing that long-anticipated global warming biological side
effects are already happening. Other studies looked at global warming
connections to wildfires and die-offs of plant and animal species.

"What you're looking at is almost an avalanche of each individual effect,"
said Stanford University biological sciences professor Stephen Schneider.
"As it gets warmer and as we measure more things, the evidence accumulates."

___

On the Net:

Nature: http://www.nature.com/nature

NASA study:
http://www.nasa.gov/centers/goddard/news/topstory/2006/warm_marine.html
Previous post Next post
Up