Should I actually switch out a good portion of my icons for Sharma icons, or should I exercise restraint and only give the man a twenty-icon (give or take one or so) limit? Probably the latter.
Sounds like a plan. And really, I pretty much post daily, just not to this journal. >D D_M just gets all the posting now, and really, I GOTTA HAVE MORE SHARMA ICONS OH DEAR ME OH DEAR.
I should just sack up and do that hundred icon challenge. At any rate, who is denying this? I have done no such thing.
::dies:: That's insane. You're already approaching the 100-icon limit? You already have this dilemma?
(I'd say to shoot for practicality, and prioritize the icons you can see yourself using in posts/comments. There's nothing worse than to have thirty really pretty ambiguous icons . . . and yet always be missing a "grumpy" one.)
(--OR WOULD BE, IF THEY WERE ACTUALLY MOO ICONS)missitarNovember 23 2005, 06:48:29 UTC
. . . ::DIES:: what is wrong with my icon. Can you see the icon that was just posted with my comment, or is it just my computer? It's some sultry black-haired woman with an alluringly askew glance, and is not the icon I uploaded.
Re: (--OR WOULD BE, IF THEY WERE ACTUALLY MOO ICONS)omiNovember 23 2005, 18:53:50 UTC
I actually can see the DON'T TALK icon, but now and then your icons DO mutiny. (I wonder if you remember the weird grainy badly resized stick figure my computer insisted was one of your icons a long time ago.)
Comments 22
I mean...c'mon, you hardly ever post anyways XD And Sharma has eaten your head, you can't deny it.
Reply
I should just sack up and do that hundred icon challenge. At any rate, who is denying this? I have done no such thing.
Reply
(I'd say to shoot for practicality, and prioritize the icons you can see yourself using in posts/comments. There's nothing worse than to have thirty really pretty ambiguous icons . . . and yet always be missing a "grumpy" one.)
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
~Zenith
Reply
Leave a comment