(a) Not those ones; (b) right, but I feel it detracts from the whole "all I did was copy a work of art and they made me cover it" vibe, if the original already incorporates some of the covering that was "added"; (c) if, as you say, the fact of it representing Aphrodite constitutes sexual context, then presumably the words "Aphrodite" and "Venus" themselves are equally sexual, and this sentence has strong sexual content. This is not really what I meant, and I doubt that the neighbours would have wanted the first word of "Venus de Milo" to be covered, had the snow sculpture been labelled.
What I'm getting at is that I dispute the notion that something being "high art" (whatever that is) disqualifies it from being sexual. I blame the Victorians. They desperately needed an excuse for having all this porn lying around within their cultural heritage, so they convinced everyone that it was somehow a special case.
Well OK, but regardless of her being the anthropomorphic personification of whatever, a picture of Aphrodite waiting for the bus doesn't have a whole lot more evident sexual context than a picture of anyone else waiting for a bus. This assuming you can even tell it's Aphrodite. I guess in this case it's a sculpture of her winning a beauty pageant (that part, I did have to look up) so it's not entirely simple, and maybe replace "sexual" and "non-sexual" with "more sexual" and "insufficiently sexual" as appropriate.
The Victorians may have had all kinds of hang-ups and excuses, but I'm not trying to invoke an absolute rule that "art" inherently cannot have sexual context. I am saying that you can pretty much only see snow boobs as *automatically* sexual, if you've first convinced yourself that boobs are all about sex. Having the police come along and force the offender to raunch it up a bit speaks for itself. Of course the person who actually complained possibly would have preferred something with a sensible collar.
Comments 9
Did you check? Actually, the Venus de Milo is a comparatively rare example of a female form sculpture that does have visible abs.
Hang on a second, the actual Venus de Milo is already wearing a sarong.
But not a bikini top.
a nude female form in a non-sexual context
How is Aphrodite non-sexual?!
Reply
Reply
What I'm getting at is that I dispute the notion that something being "high art" (whatever that is) disqualifies it from being sexual. I blame the Victorians. They desperately needed an excuse for having all this porn lying around within their cultural heritage, so they convinced everyone that it was somehow a special case.
Reply
The Victorians may have had all kinds of hang-ups and excuses, but I'm not trying to invoke an absolute rule that "art" inherently cannot have sexual context. I am saying that you can pretty much only see snow boobs as *automatically* sexual, if you've first convinced yourself that boobs are all about sex. Having the police come along and force the offender to raunch it up a bit speaks for itself. Of course the person who actually complained possibly would have preferred something with a sensible collar.
Reply
Leave a comment