Rationalisation of the Week

[oneplusme]

Remember: Your D/s lifestyle isn't a sin if it's a biblically-approved D/s lifestyle...

(Via the ever-entertaining Jesus' General.)

I was going to make some sort of hilarious "Gor blimey"-based pun here, but I thought better of it.

Comments

[oneplusme]

The only scary bit about the CDD folks is that I'm sure they'd fervently deny even the slightest similarity between their ideas and D/s relationships. Indeed, one suspects that they wouldn't even be able to understand why anyone would make the comparison...

The Goreans, on the other hand, are just charmingly suburban. With poor taste in literature.

[weds]

Oh, these guys. OK. Near as I can tell, you can (eventually) rationalize pretty much any in-marriage sex within evangelical Christianity so long as it isn't anal or between men.

[oneplusme]

Y'know, I had a suspicion you would've heard of this. Or possibly that you'd have a complete collection of her novels on a shelf somewhere. (That said, I'd be intrigued and/or amused to see someone attempt to justify a F/m or lesbian relationship (within marriage...) on biblical grounds. You will now, I fear, prove me wrong with URLs.)

So, have they allied themselves with the Promise Keepers yet?

[wolfie]

MIGHT MAKES RIGHT. BEWARE FIRE AND BRIMSTONE. KINK IS FINE, BUT ONLY IN MODERATION.

[/capsoflol]

I need to get out more, apparently. I'm dabbling only in the stuff they can't justify. :/