Leave a comment

Comments 18

wingerramble February 25 2009, 04:13:33 UTC
As for the founding fathers, they were vehemently against the country supporting any one sect of a religion (such as Catholicism or Protestantism) because of the recent fiascoes of their time. You use extremely revisionist theory for the actual thoughts of the founding fathers on religion. But then, Onimaster has already made it clear that you are both allowed to use biased sources, without affecting the truth, so very well, let's assume that your revisionist views on the founding fathers are accurate ( ... )

Reply


azurethunder February 25 2009, 07:11:33 UTC
I've shortened your comments for character count, but left context cues ( ... )

Reply


azurethunder February 25 2009, 07:12:48 UTC
-However, if they believed in the sort of separation, please explain the following, to name a few ( ... )

Reply


wingerramble March 8 2009, 14:35:52 UTC
There is no point continuing this discussion. If you will not question, will not look at the evidence, follow only your assertions, and insult things that you obviously do not understand, then there is no point.

Reply

onimaster March 8 2009, 17:33:07 UTC
I said that from the beginning.

I'll look at the evidence. I just won't look at it with a pre-formulated conclusions.

So, because I/we do not agree or allow ourselves to be swayed by your arguments we must not understand; is that it. We can't just be right, so we must be stupid.

Reply

azurethunder March 10 2009, 03:39:30 UTC
-There is no point continuing this discussion ( ... )

Reply


Leave a comment

Up