[CFUD 38 - Tomo]

Nov 05, 2006 12:27

So, have you got any idea who the second piece of the evidence means? The one about the guy being fried to a crisp.

Leave a comment

Comments 40

the_wildcat November 6 2006, 01:38:10 UTC
Why're you givin' me that look right off the bat? . . . Nah not really? I mean does anyone here use a lot've fire? Or is it maybe something in someone's alibi that they're not tellin' us? Like the monocle thing was from Ed's e-mail, he said! I need to go catch up.

Reply

onsen_addict November 6 2006, 01:39:43 UTC
It's just a look. The attorney already told Ed he doesn't think that part points to anyone, but that was after I made this post. It looks like it's just between us and Ed this time.

Reply

the_wildcat November 6 2006, 01:44:22 UTC
Well the attorney told me my alibi's false, which means you're not clear. And if it's the three of us . . . then between you and Ed . . .

Reply

onsen_addict November 6 2006, 01:46:57 UTC
Didn't the shepherd say the alibis were just to mess with us anyway? . . . Yeah, between you and him for me. It's hard to tell this early.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up