EMERGENCY MESSAGE

Jun 01, 2012 23:27

goddamn, how many times to i have to freakin upload the same freakin explanation to all these sites?? its not like anyone cares. oh well, here goes:

hi, my name is Helix Velecloid. ive already been to this site called furaffinity and more reasearch on the subject brought me here.if you read my bio or whatever, it gets a little strange. so here i am ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 25

westly_roanoke June 2 2012, 05:14:50 UTC
So, can they not type in the future?

Reply

helixvelecloid June 2 2012, 06:01:56 UTC
if by they, you mean us, there are these little airplush devices (airplush is an invisible and untouchable combination of densely electromagnetic fields that are scientifically programmed to move the flow of electrons in a designated space) that fit into our ears (technically, there's nothing in our ears, just visual space that holds thousands of electrons capable of completing almost any electrical target) and captures the self-constructed images, sounds, and thoughts that are in our minds and transfers them to any selected target, might they be on a screen, or projecting into reality. thats how we type. however, the words that we think are almost never translated into text, we only send the thoughts through other people's brain. thats why the text you read is so warped sometimes, especially with things like capitalization. we just don't have a need for computers and words anymore. by the way, im not a geek, im literally copying this out of my science screenbook.

Reply

westly_roanoke June 2 2012, 06:12:40 UTC
That doesn't sound like it'd be very good.

See, I work in customer service, and one of the things I'd be concerned about is the lack of capital letters. You think that if they had the ability for space flight they'd have the ability to translate thoughts into coherent sentences, and at the very least figure out the your/you're/yore issue.

I will be on the forefront of maintaining the English language well into my, what, 60s?

But that's alright, I'm a vampire anyway, and we're known for sticking to our ways.

Reply

helixvelecloid June 2 2012, 14:10:51 UTC
well, maybe its just my dads prototype. i dont know, how am i supposed to figure out?

Reply


tieran June 2 2012, 17:53:15 UTC
The nuclear radiation = anthro thing is so campy sci-fi, I love it! Even if that's, ya know, not how nuclear radiation affects things at all ( ... )

Reply

helixvelecloid June 2 2012, 22:23:17 UTC
I'm sorry, but i dont know about how nuclear radiation used to be like and i dont really care all that much. im not even sure if i believe that whole space adventure escape even happened, i just sent exactly what my screenbook read. in fact, now that you say this, i think it could be a lie. right now, the government has been really squeaky over the past few years, with some incidents that have happened without any answers or explanation. all i know is what they teach us at school, when our school isnt cancelled because of "mass derealization". but in any case, the world appears to be changing so violently for you in your time, perhaps in even the near future, nuclear radiation will have been altered to be able to mold things together, i might research that at another time. for now my mind has changed to the fact that the government is keeping alot of stuff from us knowing.

Reply

tieran June 2 2012, 23:48:48 UTC
xD You're cute.

Nuclear radiation doesn't 'alter' in it's effects. It's like liquid. Liquid, spilled onto a subject, makes subject wet. Always has, does, and will.

Similarly, radiation will not ever 'merge' the DNA of fully formed specimens (i.e. not developing fetuses) of any species.

*nerd-cap GO*

One could conceivably (without the use of DNA damaging radiation) apply certain chemicals and proteins to a developing fetus, turning on or off certain markers, and coax a change that might resemble an anthropomorphic type of being, perhaps.

But even then, that doesn't 'smush' things together. And wouldn't happen upon 'accidentally' careening into an atmosphere either x3

Reply

helixvelecloid June 3 2012, 00:01:37 UTC
Fine, I'm not the smartest guy when it comes to science. I base my explanations on what I learn in school, for me that's eighth grade. You finally got me, it's not real, but would it kill you if I kept writing about my fictional tale?

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

helixvelecloid June 2 2012, 22:11:21 UTC
you think this isnt real? ill tell you whats real. do you think people in the 1950s would believe that in the future there would be machines so small you could put them in your pockets and they could communicate with people thousands of miles away? no, they didn't. that's just a 50 year difference, and back in the 2010s the technology rate was vastly improving, developing, changing, that by 2018, according to some research i found online at that time, humans had already discovered how to copy the matter of any object and duplicate it and/or mathematically reconstruct it to reconfigure its atom database and make any changes to its physical state. i think a time traveling computer might be a possibility about 400 years later.

Reply

(The comment has been removed)

helixvelecloid June 2 2012, 22:25:39 UTC
well, i asked my dad about this and his best explanation was that as the levels of advancing in technology go up, the awareness of the human language goes cooperatively down. i dont know if thats the cause, but who does?

Reply


rabbitswift June 2 2012, 23:45:10 UTC
Gene Roddenberry did it better, guy.

And your proof for all this nonsense would be what?

Reply

helixvelecloid June 2 2012, 23:59:57 UTC
Ok, you got me. but you gotta give me credit for imagination. I honestly didn't think people would question this stuff. I don't even know what I thought. It's not real, though i wish it was. But I really want to continue writing about some of this stuff. Or would you guys freak out if I did that too?

Reply


mavinmaverick June 4 2012, 12:21:11 UTC
It's interesting...but as others have pointed out already, it would be much more believable if you had run it by an editor first. No history text book, past, present, or future would have that many editorial mistakes. Text books also have a certain tone to them that you didn't quite manage to capture...I know, I read history/polictical/social text books all the time ( ... )

Reply

helixvelecloid June 4 2012, 17:06:23 UTC
I dunno if that'll happen anytime soon. I have school to worry about for the next 5-8 years before I'm ready to call a literacy agent.

Reply

mavinmaverick June 4 2012, 17:39:07 UTC
LOL That gives you plenty of time to work on it. Getting a literary agent is the last piece of the puzzel...often after getting a publishing contract. The initial writing is the biggest, most time consuming part.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up