Grammatical question plznthx

Oct 02, 2008 00:20

Okay!! This has been driving me nuts. I keep thinking it's one way, and then changing my mind. So, another question, for those in the grammatical know:

When you split up speech with description, what are the punctuation rules?

For example, the line:

"No," he shook his head tiredly. "It wasn't meant to be like this." Is 'he' meant to be ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 33

chloe1910 October 1 2008, 14:35:55 UTC
For me, if after the no is a comma, 'he' would not be capitalised. Anyway, in this context, since "he shook head tiredly" is in reference to the "No", I would not capitalise it too.

I will capitalise "It" cause it's a new sentence. I'm not sure if I'm right or wrong but that's what I learned and usually how I write.

Reply

orionsroad October 1 2008, 14:39:09 UTC
The way I wrote it is what I usually think is right, but I'm really, really not sure anymore. ^^; It makes sense though that if there is a comma, the next word would not be capitalised, as you say.

Aish, why is english so damned complicated??? Bah. :P

Thanks dear!

Reply


milena_1980 October 1 2008, 14:36:25 UTC
'He' isn't meant to be capitalized. About the comma and 'it', I've seen the following:

"No," he shook his head tiredly, "it wasn't meant to be like this."

Unless you mean for the "it . . ." to be a new sentence.

*goes check her grammar books*

Reply

orionsroad October 1 2008, 14:41:33 UTC
The problem that I see with the comma/it thing is that if there is a comma after 'tiredly', then the sentence doesn't end? Because, (as my brain is arguing it at the moment), 'he shook his head tiredly' is not part of the sentence "No, it wasn't meant to be like this." and therefore the full stop only ends that sentence. If, er, that makes any sense?

Reply

milena_1980 October 1 2008, 14:58:12 UTC
Ok, just grabbed one of Faulkner's novels and found the following sentence:

"You better stay here tonight," I says, "and get a early start for New Hope tomorrow morning."

I've seen this in many novels, therefore, as long as it is one sentence, it's allowed. 'he shook his head tiredly' is separated from the main sentence with the quoting marks, so I think it's correct to use it.

I'll let you know if I find something more "official"" ^^;;

Reply

orionsroad October 1 2008, 15:00:30 UTC
XD Faulkner seems quite trustworthy. Heh.

Thanks for that! I guess for the moment I'll do it either way...

"No," he shook his head tiredly. "It wasn't meant to be like this."
or
"No," he shook his head tiredly, "it wasn't meant to be like this."

Reply


t_i_ra_mi_su October 1 2008, 14:40:26 UTC
What you have right up there is correct. :)

However, if you want to go with a comma after tiredly, you'd end up with:

"No," he shook his head tiredly, "it wasn't meant to be like this."

Personally, however, I adhere to the former (the one with the full stop). :)

Reply

orionsroad October 1 2008, 14:44:12 UTC
Thanks for clarifying!

And sorry, just to question even further... in the case of:
"No," he shook his head tiredly, "it wasn't meant to be like this."

The full stop at the end of the quoted sentence also ends the ‘he shook his head tiredly’ sentence?

Reply

t_i_ra_mi_su October 1 2008, 15:13:56 UTC
Yeah, basically, if you look at the whole sentence, it would be that the person shook his head tiredly while saying, "No, it wasn't meant to be like this." So, in essence, you've got one whole sentence, of which the full stop at the end nicely ties up altogether. :) Hope that made sense.

Although, if you're unsure, your best bet would probably to go with the full stop after 'tiredly'. I guess the important thing is just to remember parallelism - remember that if you choose to go with a full stop, you have to capitalize the first letter of the next quote, while if you choose to go with the comma, your next quote should start in the lowercase. :) Pick one style, so to speak, and stick to it. Consistency is the key. :D /not making sense

Hope this helps. :D

Reply

orionsroad October 1 2008, 15:21:34 UTC
Okay, that makes sense.

Thanks for taking the time to explain. ^_^ I'll probably stick with the fullstop-capital, but it's good to know the other one anyway just in case and also for betaing.

Again, thank you! ^_^

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

orionsroad October 1 2008, 14:45:17 UTC
Logically, that's what I'd assume too. It's just... a bit confusing. ^^; Stupid English language.

Thanks though. ^_^

Reply


bellasurus October 1 2008, 14:51:16 UTC
i think if there's a said then you add a comma?

like:

"No," he said, shaking his head tiredly, "I'd rather not."

or can be separate, i think, it depends on the dialogue itself~

Reply

orionsroad October 2 2008, 01:03:13 UTC
Well, you're right about the said - which I need actually for the sentence to be correct at all. >_< ARUHIUFD. I don't know enough about grammar, frsrs. >_< ^^;

Reply


Leave a comment

Up