isn't this wonderful? you win. anyway, boys who like boys could be happy liking girls if they tried, and girls who like girls could like boys. discuss.
ive always been pretty pro-opposing gender myself so i would say it would prolly be easier for the case to go back to "normal", but then again i couldnt imagine going vice versa... hope that struck some sort of help
two parts, again.ehttahwMarch 23 2004, 19:02:34 UTC
if orientation is the result of strictly biological components, then "trying" to change would also require the influence of external chemical means to change whatever sets a person in one direction or the other (or both, but that case will be the base for the fourth paragraph), and may not be possible at all (since the balances of life are a bitch to recreate
( ... )
Re: two parts, again.ourlastheroMarch 24 2004, 03:41:34 UTC
i was wrong. the word bisexual has bad connotations but i do believe that people can be sexually indifferent and just be waiting to feel like they're in love regardless of the gender of the person making them feel that way. i just think that most people that actually call themselves bisexual aren't so righteous. at least not most women calling themselves bi. i'm more inclined to give guys the benefit of the doubt because they meet with more public opposition. though i'm not going to say that bi women and lesbians don't meet with opposition from straight women.
so now that i'm feeling pressured to comment...i really don't know what to say. i'm inclined to say no, but i suppose there's a possibility. i mean, isn't this why people are married for years, get divorced, and decide they're gay? while it's possible that they were completely miserable for the entire duration of their marriage, there must have been something enjoyable to it. or maybe that's just living in fear. hence the lack of comment-age. i have no valid argument or answer. but i feel more than loved for being (indirectly) asked for my input.
Well if they didn't like whoever they married, they wouldn't have married them in the first place...or else they're all just stupid. Because even if you are trying to hold up some illusion that you're something that you're not, you don't make a commitment like marriage to the sake of upholding an illusion. Besides, there are plenty of valid "straight" excuses they could have used for not getting married, but they chose to anyhow.
i wouldnt consider the people who get married the "straight" way despite the fact that they r not straight stupid. i mean yeah maybe they should have realized that down the road things werent going to go right, and they should have been marrying for love. but that doesnt make them stupid. people have different beliefs on what marriage is and the fact that they thought of it differently then u would have in that situation doesnt make them stupid. i mean maybe they thought they could force straightness upon themselves bc they wanted the life of having kids of there own and such, and then realized that something like sexual orientation just isnt something that can be changed. but then i almost think that no one really does have a sexual orientation, like its just who ever you fall in love w/, u fall in love with the person behind the body that defines ur gender and so if the person u fall in love w/ happens to be of the other sex than so be it. and people who label themselves as straight look for love in the opposite sex while people who
( ... )
id love to respond, but i really dont know how to. id imagine that an individual is attracted to who he or she is attracted to.if that makes them happy then taht makes them happy. period. it really shouldnt be looked into any further than that.
Comments 11
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
hence the lack of comment-age. i have no valid argument or answer. but i feel more than loved for being (indirectly) asked for my input.
Reply
Reply
Reply
Reply
-matt
Reply
Leave a comment