(Untitled)

Jan 31, 2009 18:05

Leave a comment

Comments 10

nixwilliams January 31 2009, 07:16:21 UTC
oxymoronia January 31 2009, 07:37:03 UTC
That's awesome!!! :D I don't know if I'd be brave enough to do it in Australia with all the snakes and ants and whatnot but I would be tempted if I was somewhere else.

Reply

nixwilliams January 31 2009, 07:43:02 UTC
it's one of those things that i'm pretty sure i'd never do, what with the whole trans thing. but it's a nice idea!

Reply

oxymoronia January 31 2009, 07:59:45 UTC
You might find a space one day where it would feel OK... I wouldn't do it everywhere or for very long, especially with all the practical stuff to think about, I'd much rather a layer of fabric covering me than having thick greasy sunscreen everywhere. Humans are so silly, we really should be more furry!

Reply


merle_ January 31 2009, 15:21:25 UTC
Dunno, I've always liked the utility of clothing in protecting me from the environment. I bet those hikers have to stick to well beaten paths rather than wandering off through the bramble...

Reply

oxymoronia January 31 2009, 15:43:10 UTC
And the straps of the rucksack would be chafing at your skin... and as I said above, there's all the greasy sunscreen... ready to collect dust and grime.

They should make a bigger deal out of promoting skinny-dipping since it makes more sense!

Reply

merle_ January 31 2009, 16:02:19 UTC
But.. but.. skinny-dipping might lead to playful frolicking! ;-)

I wonder if the nude hikers allow themselves tents. After all, just like clothing, a tent hides the human body...

Reply

oxymoronia January 31 2009, 16:18:46 UTC
And frolicking is bad how? ;)

That's an interesting question... I think it depends on whether you think of tents as protection or concealment. After all, that's probably how clothes started out before everyone decided to get prudish about it.

Reply


Leave a comment

Up