(Untitled)

Nov 23, 2011 16:55

In terms of Philosophy of Mind, how would you describe your position ( Read more... )

Leave a comment

Comments 10

cartesiandaemon November 23 2011, 18:02:50 UTC
I actually had a quite extended argument with Rachel's brother Jacob (who is a grad student or postdoc in Philosophy), although I'm sure it annoyed everyone at the dinner table we were talking round ( ... )

Reply

ciphergoth November 24 2011, 08:41:52 UTC
Under this classification, what sort of property captures the difference between a Bach CD and a David Bowie CD?

Reply

cartesiandaemon November 24 2011, 13:01:53 UTC
How do you mean? I've no idea, I don't know the technical vocabulary, or even most of the concepts, at all.

Reply


wight1984 November 23 2011, 18:50:02 UTC
Interesting that there's no idealism option. I'd be an idealist before a materialist. I'd generally go with (what I like to think of as) a Kantian approach and throw myself in with Transcendental Idealism ( ... )

Reply

wight1984 November 23 2011, 18:55:41 UTC
So, basically, Materialism as a model of the universe is brilliant, especially for scientific purposes. I'd consider it very accurate (there's a reason why we evolved to view the world that way).

I don't think it's true as a metaphysical position though.

The only things we arguably experience in itself, rather than via representation, is thought, feeling and direct sensory input (before it's organised into a framework). Those building blocks aren't material at all and the rest is mentally constructed.

Reply

palmer1984 November 23 2011, 18:56:21 UTC
Maybe transcendental idealism should have been an option, but I can't explain it in a sentence :).

Reply

wight1984 November 23 2011, 19:08:28 UTC
That's a fair point :oP

Reply


emmy_mallow November 23 2011, 21:22:17 UTC
I'd say materialist but then I work in science with a bunch of scientists day in and day out. I expect I've adopted a more science based approach to the world as a result.

Reply


(The comment has been removed)

ciphergoth November 24 2011, 08:39:58 UTC
"He's a reductionist" is another way of saying "He actually tries to understand things" :-)

Reply


Leave a comment

Up